SPONSORED:

Tough road ahead for McConnell on ObamaCare

Republicans on Tuesday cleared a crucial hurdle to begin the Senate healthcare debate, but now face the danger of a circular firing squad if they are unable to unify around a single proposal.

The successful procedural vote sets up 20 hours of floor debate and votes on a virtually unlimited number of amendments, known as a vote-a-rama.

Many of these amendments will fail, and some will pit centrists in the GOP conference against conservatives, a division that has made it exceedingly difficult for Republicans to move forward on ObamaCare repeal.

ADVERTISEMENT

At press time, votes were expected Tuesday night on an amendment to repeal ObamaCare in two years, and one to repeal and replace ObamaCare with a substitute that Senate Republicans have been working on behind closed doors for months.

Both of those amendments are widely expected to fail, but GOP leaders think it will help them to determine how much support exists for both measures.

That information could be used to craft another compromise before the underlying healthcare bill comes up for a final vote.

Another possibility that seemed to have growing momentum on Tuesday is a so-called “skinny” ObamaCare repeal bill that would only eliminate the healthcare law’s insurance mandates on individuals and businesses and an unpopular tax on medical devices.

If that legislation can pass the Senate, it could be brought to a conference negotiation with the House, when lawmakers from both chambers would try to reconcile their differing products.

Yet it is far from clear that even the “skinny” measure could win support.

Sen. Susan CollinsSusan Margaret CollinsPelosi: 'No intention' of abandoning Democrats' infrastructure goals Collins says infrastructure bill won't have gas tax increase or undo 2017 tax reform bill What the Democrats should be doing to reach true bipartisanship MORE (R-Maine), long a holdout from her party in the healthcare debate, expressed skepticism about the approach on Tuesday. Sen. John McCainJohn Sidney McCainMeghan McCain: Harris 'sounded like a moron' discussing immigration Arizona AG Mark Brnovich launches Senate challenge to Mark Kelly Arizona Democrats launch voter outreach effort ahead of key Senate race MORE (R-Ariz.) predicted in a dramatic floor speech after his return to the Senate following a brain cancer diagnosis that the entire effort was likely to fail, and that Republicans should start over with an open process and committee hearings.

Democrats plan to make the process as painful as possible for Republicans by dragging out proceedings. No Democrats backed the measure to begin debate, and they withheld their “no” votes until the end to highlight the contrast to the GOP.

On Tuesday evening, Democrats forced the Senate clerk to read the entire first proposed amendment to the bill, which was expected to take a couple of hours.

“The aim of our amendment strategy is to defeat the various versions of repeal they proposed and to make it as hard as possible to get to 50,” said a senior Democratic aide.

Republicans control 52 seats, meaning they can survive only two defections with Democrats unified and Vice President Pence breaking a tie.

Several moderates, including Collins and Sens. Shelley Moore CapitoShelley Wellons Moore CapitoPelosi: 'No intention' of abandoning Democrats' infrastructure goals Collins says infrastructure bill won't have gas tax increase or undo 2017 tax reform bill Overnight Energy: Biden seeks to reassert US climate leadership | President to 'repeal or replace' Trump decision removing protections for Tongass | Administration proposes its first offshore wind lease sale MORE (W.Va.) and Lisa MurkowskiLisa Ann MurkowskiPelosi: 'No intention' of abandoning Democrats' infrastructure goals What the Democrats should be doing to reach true bipartisanship Democrats mull overhaul of sweeping election bill MORE (Alaska), say they will not support a repeal measure that leaves the question of replacement unanswered.

 Republicans are likely to face a rollicking debate over as many as 100 different healthcare proposals.

GOP leaders describe the “skinny” option as a fallback proposal.

“Who knows what the final bill will look like. I’d be happy to have a comprehensive bill that 50-plus senators agree to, but if we can’t, then the idea would be to come up with a core of pieces that 50 of us agree on,” Senate Majority Whip John CornynJohn CornynRising crime rejuvenates gun control debate on campaign trail Bipartisan lawmakers want Biden to take tougher action on Nicaragua Bipartisan Senate group announces infrastructure deal MORE (R-Texas) told reporters.

Even Republican leaders admitted they don’t fully know what to expect.

“There will be a lot of different amendments offered by different members trying to craft the bill. It’s really entirely impossible to predict, in a reconciliation debate, exactly what amendments will be offered or what amendments will succeed. It’s wide open,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellWhat the Democrats should be doing to reach true bipartisanship Democrats mull overhaul of sweeping election bill McConnell seeks to divide and conquer Democrats MORE (R-Ky.) told reporters.

Cornyn predicted that as many as 100 different healthcare proposals could receive votes.

“Under the budget process, everybody is entitled to get a vote on an amendment if they want one. So it’s impossible to predict the sequence,” he said. “We’re going to be doing a lot of voting this week. I hope you all have eaten your Cheerios.”

Democratic Sen. Chris MurphyChristopher (Chris) Scott MurphyDemocrats mull overhaul of sweeping election bill Rising crime rejuvenates gun control debate on campaign trail Antsy Democrats warn of infrastructure time crunch MORE (Conn.) told reporters that he alone has prepared more than 100 amendments for floor consideration.

The Budget Committee will vet the various amendments to make sure they comply with Senate rules.

The advantage of passing healthcare legislation under special budgetary rules is that GOP leaders can pass it with a simple majority, instead of 60 votes as is usually required for controversial legislation in the Senate.

But legislative provisions must pass a six-part test known as the Byrd Rule. The most stringent requirement is that the budgetary impact of the proposals must be more than incidental compared to the policy impact.

In other words, policymaking that does not have a significant impact on spending, revenues or the deficit is not allowed.

Nathaniel Weixel contributed.