Sen. Chris MurphyChristopher (Chris) Scott MurphySenators slow Biden with holds at Pentagon, State Tell our troops: 'Your sacrifice wasn't in vain' Sunday shows preview: Bombing in Kabul delivers blow to evacuation effort; US orders strikes on ISIS-K MORE (D-Conn.) on Wednesday pushed back against statements by Senate Republicans and President Trump that the latest GOP effort to repeal and replace ObamaCare includes protections for pre-existing conditions.
"This is a lie. A horrible knowing fabrication," Murphy tweeted Wednesday night. "The bill is intentionally constructed to force states to drop this protection."
This is a lie. A horrible knowing fabrication. The bill is intentionally constructed to force states to drop this protection. https://t.co/t6z2bckyN5— Chris Murphy (@ChrisMurphyCT) September 21, 2017
His comments came after Trump tweeted he wouldn't sign a health care bill if it didn't include these protections.
"I would not sign Graham-Cassidy if it did not include coverage of pre-existing conditions," Trump tweeted Wednesday night. "It does! A great Bill. Repeal & Replace."
The Senate could vote on the latest ObamaCare repeal-and-replace plan next week.
The proposal, sponsored by Sens. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamRep. Tim Ryan becomes latest COVID-19 breakthrough case in Congress Graham found Trump election fraud arguments suitable for 'third grade': Woodward book Senate parliamentarian nixes Democrats' immigration plan MORE (R-S.C.) and Bill CassidyBill CassidySunday shows - Boosters in the spotlight GOP senator: Republicans will lose if they relitigate the past Sunday shows preview: Coronavirus dominates as country struggles with delta variant MORE (R-La.), would largely dismantle ObamaCare and convert its funding to block grants that would be delivered to states, which could then spend the funding on their own health needs.
The debate over pre-existing conditions centers on a provision that allows states to waive an ObamaCare rule that prevents people with pre-existing condition from being charged higher premiums due to an illness. Critics of the bill argue that if states waived the rule, coverage could become unaffordable for people with pre-existing conditions.
Cassidy and Graham have pushed back against claims that their bill would hurt people with health problems.
Cassidy says states would have to show how they are providing "adequate and affordable" coverage to people with pre-existing conditions before waiving the ObamaCare rule.