Warren, Murkowski: Where's the emergency declaration on opioids?

Warren, Murkowski: Where's the emergency declaration on opioids?
© Getty Images

A Democratic and Republican senator are questioning why President Trump hasn’t officially declared the opioid epidemic a national emergency, despite saying his administration was drafting the paperwork to do so two months ago.

“We applaud your stated commitment to addressing opioid addiction and agree with you that the crisis is a ‘serious problem’ deserving of increased federal resources,” Sens. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth Ann WarrenWarren warns Facebook may help reelect Trump 'and profit off of it' Martin Luther King Jr.'s daughter knocks Zuckerberg for invoking her father while defending Facebook Overnight Health Care — Presented by National Taxpayers Union — House Dems advance drug pricing bill | Cases of vaping-related lung illnesses near 1,500 | Juul suspends sales of most e-cigarette flavors MORE (D-Mass.) and Lisa MurkowskiLisa Ann MurkowskiOvernight Defense — Presented by Boeing — Pence says Turkey agrees to ceasefire | Senators vow to move forward with Turkey sanctions | Mulvaney walks back comments tying Ukraine aid to 2016 probe On The Money: Senate fails to override Trump veto over border emergency | Trump resort to host G-7 next year | Senators to push Turkey sanctions despite ceasefire | McConnell tees up funding votes Senate fails to override Trump veto over emergency declaration MORE (R-Alaska) wrote in a letter to Trump, referring to comments he made on Aug. 10.

“However, we are extremely concerned that 63 days after your statement, you have yet to take the necessary steps to declare a national emergency on opioids, nor have you made any proposals to significantly increase funding to combat the epidemic,” the senators continued.

Murkowski and Warren both hail from states whose governors have declared the opioid epidemic a statewide public health emergency or disaster. According to the senators, the declarations accompanied efforts that helped each state better tackle opioid overdose deaths, which have more than quadrupled since 1999.

“Massachusetts and Alaska have been on the forefront of the opioid crisis that is sweeping our nation, and we are proud to represent states that have tackled the epidemic head on,” the two wrote. “We hope that you will back up your verbal commitment to fighting the 'serious problem' of opioid addiction with action."

On Aug. 10, Trump told reporters “this is a national emergency, and we are drawing documents now to so attest.”

“The opioid crisis is an emergency, and I’m saying officially right now, it is an emergency," Trump said. "It’s a national emergency. We’re going to spend a lot of time, a lot of effort and a lot of money on the opioid crisis."

The declaration was the “first and most urgent” recommendation in an initial report released this summer from the President’s commission to tackle the opioid epidemic. The panel's final report is due Nov. 1.

The move would be unprecedented, as a national emergency declaration has never before been made for drug abuse. It’s unclear exactly what the order would mean and how it would work.

“The President’s policy advisors are working through the details with all of the relevant components and agencies. Right now these actions are undergoing a legal review,” a White House spokesman wrote in an email Wednesday afternoon.

Some advocates are frustrated that the declaration hasn’t yet been made. Others say they’d rather the administration take its time so as to get the declaration right. Some experts aren’t so sure the declaration is needed and say the president can use existing authorities to curb the crisis.