Democrats seek cosponsors for new 'Medicare for all' bill

Two progressive lawmakers are circulating a letter to their Democratic colleagues asking for cosponsors for a Medicare for all bill as they prepare to introduce it.

Reps. Pramila JayapalPramila JayapalProgressive House Democrat unveils bill to allow state-based 'Medicare for All' Progressives press Democrats to rethink Israel policy Democratic lawmakers call on Judiciary Committee to advance 'revenge porn' law MORE (D-Wash.) and Debbie DingellDeborah (Debbie) Ann DingellDemocrats demand FCC act over leak of phone location data Democratic lawmakers, 2020 candidates pay tribute to Conyers Hillicon Valley: Facebook launches 'News Tab' | Senate passes bill to take on 'deepfakes' | Schumer outlines vision for electric cars MORE (D-Mich.) sent the letter, which was obtained by The Hill, on Tuesday, saying they have been working with experts for months to write an updated version of the single-payer health care legislation. Jayapal says she plans to introduce the measure later this month.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We are writing to ask for your support as an original cosponsor of the Medicare for All Act of 2019,” the letter states. “This is a watershed moment in the fight for guaranteed health care for every resident of the United States.”

The existence of the letter was first reported by The Washington Post.

“For the past several months, we have worked closely with policy experts, health care professionals, patient advocates and movement leaders to revise and improve the bill formerly introduced by Congressman John ConyersJohn James ConyersThe Hill's 12:30 Report: Dems release first transcripts from impeachment probe witnesses Hispanic Caucus dedicates Day of the Dead altar to migrants who died in US custody Today On Rising: The media beclowns themselves on Baghdadi MORE as HR 676, which laid the foundation for what a Medicare for All system should look like,” Jayapal and Dingell write. “We incorporated important updates made in Senator Sanders’ Medicare for All bill, as well as additional updates critical to our country’s future health care system.”

The letter says that as of Tuesday there were 93 cosponsors on the bill. A Democratic aide said that by the time it is introduced they expect to have “more than 100.”

The measure has no chance of being signed into law with President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump faces high stakes in meeting with Erdoğan amid impeachment drama Democrats worry they don't have right candidate to beat Trump Trump threatening to fire Mulvaney: report MORE in the White House and a Republican Senate, but the measure is a marker of where many Democrats are pushing for their party and the country to go.

Even among Democrats in the House, there are divisions. Democratic leaders have not given their support to the bill, and are currently focused on strengthening the Affordable Care Act.

Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiGiuliani pens op-ed slamming 'unprecedented' impeachment inquiry Brindisi, Lamb recommended for Armed Services, Transportation Committees Overnight Health Care: Top health official defends contract payments to Trump allies | Vaping advocates confident Trump will turn from flavor ban | Sanders gets endorsement from nurses union MORE (D-Calif.) has given support for hearings on Medicare for all, though, which are expected to occur in the coming weeks in the House Budget and House Rules Committees.

The bill to be introduced will add a range of benefits to enhance the coverage currently provided under Medicare, according to the letter, including “dental, vision, prescription drugs, women’s reproductive health services, maternity and newborn care, long term services and supports and more.”

“It would require no out-of-pocket costs for patients for any services, and it would allow all patients the freedom to choose the doctors, hospitals, and other providers they wish to see,” the letter adds.

Jayapal previously told reporters that the bill will not spell out the tax increases needed to pay for the immense cost of the measure, something that will be very controversial.