Sen. Chris MurphyChristopher (Chris) Scott MurphyDemocratic senator: Methane fee could be 'in jeopardy' Democrats ready to put a wrap on dragged-out talks Democrats look for plan B on filibuster MORE (D-Conn.) said Wednesday he may vote against a bipartisan measure to lower health care costs next week unless it addresses a GOP “sabotage” of ObamaCare.
Murphy told reporters he is worried that there is “no language in the measure to counteract the massive sabotage campaign that's happening by the administration.” The measure is currently before members of the Senate Health Committee.
But the measure steers clear of the divisive debate over ObamaCare, which Alexander says is by design after his previous effort with Murray to shore up the health care law ran aground because of the deep divide over ObamaCare.
Murphy, one of Democrats’ top advocates for the Affordable Care Act (ACA), says that the health care package should not move forward without addressing President TrumpDonald TrumpJan. 6 panel plans to subpoena Trump lawyer who advised on how to overturn election Texans chairman apologizes for 'China virus' remark Biden invokes Trump in bid to boost McAuliffe ahead of Election Day MORE’s actions, which include slashing funding for enrollment outreach, opening up skimpier, cheaper health plans and backing a lawsuit to overturn the entire ACA.
“I'm not planning to; I'm considering it,” Murphy told reporters when asked about voting no in the committee markup next week.
He said he might also offer amendments to try to address the administration’s actions, but those are sure to be rejected by Republicans on the committee.
Democrats are trying to strike a balance between attacking Republicans for their assaults on ObamaCare, an issue that has borne political fruit, and working in a bipartisan way on health care legislation.
Murphy’s opinion differs from that of Murray, the top Democrat on the committee, who negotiated the package with Alexander and is supporting it.
When asked about Murphy's comments on Wednesday, Murray told reporters that she also wants to address the administration’s actions on ObamaCare but indicated she will not vote against the package over Republicans’ refusal to address ObamaCare in the legislation.
“I adamantly oppose what the administration has been doing,” Murray said. “We're working on a much smaller package of bills, but I still agree with Chris and all of us that we need to address sabotage.”
Alexander said in a statement in response to Murphy’s comments that the issue of ObamaCare should be handled separately from the bipartisan package.
“What to do about ObamaCare is a different debate that I’m sure will continue,” Alexander said. “In the end, it is hard to lower the cost of health insurance without first lowering the cost of health care.”
Murphy said he has been talking to his Democratic colleagues about his concerns and said others share them, though no other Senate Democrat has threatened to oppose the package because of the ObamaCare concerns.
A spokesperson for Sen. Tammy BaldwinTammy Suzanne BaldwinProviding affordable housing to recruit our next generation of volunteer firefighters Progressives push back on decision to shrink Biden's paid family leave program Building back better by investing in workers and communities MORE (D-Wis.), who has partnered with Murphy in the past on calling attention to ObamaCare “sabotage,” said that Baldwin is more concerned with adding a drug pricing transparency measure to the package than addressing ObamaCare in it.
“Senator Baldwin made it clear yesterday she would like her bipartisan FAIR Drug Pricing Act included in this legislation,” the Baldwin spokesperson said. “So she is not a yes on the larger HELP package at this time.”