Williamson says she believes in vaccines, acknowledges 'self-inflicted wound'

Williamson says she believes in vaccines, acknowledges 'self-inflicted wound'
© Aaron Schwartz

Democratic presidential candidate Marianne WilliamsonMarianne WilliamsonMarianne Williamson says she supports Yang in Iowa caucuses Patrick backs reparations in unveiling 'Equity Agenda for Black Americans' Marianne Williamson drops out of 2020 race MORE said in an interview published Friday that she is “pro-vaccine,” but acknowledged her previous statements on the issue have been a “self-inflicted wound.”

“I'm pro-vaccine. Pro-medicine,” Williamson, a self-help author, told The Hollywood Reporter

ADVERTISEMENT
Williamson was challenged last month in a contentious interview on “The View” over her previous statements calling vaccine mandates “draconian” and “Orwellian.”

“My sloppiness in talking about that was a self-inflicted wound,” Williamson said. 

But she added "The View" co-hosts treated her unfairly. 

“I said to Joy BeharJosephine (Joy) Victoria BeharBehar to Klobuchar: 'If you were a man, you'd be further ahead' Trump Jr's 'Triggered' debuts at No. 1 on NY Times bestseller list Trump Jr. visit to 'The View' boosts ratings to highest in six months MORE during the break, ‘Why are you doing this? I'm a liberal,’ ” Williamson said. “ ‘Why are you doing this?’ She said, ‘What are you talking about? I've always been good to you.’ I said, ‘Until today you have been.’ I don't understand it.”

Williamson has been trying to walk back her skeptical statements about vaccines, which are widely affirmed by public health experts as being safe and necessary, though she still said in Friday’s interview that there could be questions about them.

“Any time there is a medical intervention, there is both benefit and risk,” she said. “Government must come down on the side of public health.” 

“Having said that, I understand that many areas having to do with food, health and safety are places where Americans have questions,” she added. “And I don't believe that questioning should be squashed. There is intelligent nuance that should be respected.”