SPONSORED:

Coalition of conservative groups to air ads against bipartisan proposal to end 'surprise' medical bills

Coalition of conservative groups to air ads against bipartisan proposal to end 'surprise' medical bills
© iStock

Conservative groups launched a new coalition on Wednesday to sink a bipartisan proposal in Congress to end the "surprise" medical bills some patients get. 

The Coalition Against Rate-Setting will air ads against the proposal, which would ban providers from sending surprise bills and instead require insurers to pay them.

Patients are subject to surprise bills when they go to a hospital or emergency room that is in-network but are treated by an out-of-network doctor.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ending surprise bills is a top priority for both Democrats and Republicans in Congress, as well as for President TrumpDonald TrumpNoem touts South Dakota coronavirus response, knocks lockdowns in CPAC speech On The Trail: Cuomo and Newsom — a story of two embattled governors McCarthy: 'I would bet my house' GOP takes back lower chamber in 2022 MORE

Under the proposal, offered by Senate Health Committee Chairman Lamar AlexanderLamar AlexanderCongress addressed surprise medical bills, but the issue is not resolved Trump renominates Judy Shelton in last-ditch bid to reshape Fed Senate swears-in six new lawmakers as 117th Congress convenes MORE (R-Tenn.) and House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Frank Pallone Jr. (D-N.J.), the cost insurers pay would be based on the average price for the services provided, a method called “benchmarking.”

But action has been difficult as lawmakers face a high-dollar pressure campaign sponsored by hospitals, insurance companies, doctors and private equity groups that are all trying to tilt the measure in their favor.

The conservative coalition, which includes fiscally conservative groups like the Taxpayers Protection Alliance (TPA) and Heritage Action for America, calls the proposal "rate-setting" that meddles in private health care decisions.

The coalition will air digital and video ads through May but has not decided on a final ad budget.

"This coalition is prepared to push back against ill-considered rate-setting proposals and educate lawmakers and the public on the perils of federal meddling in healthcare decisions," said TPA President  David Williams.

ADVERTISEMENT

The TPA has already run $500,000 worth of ads in Kentucky, Kansas, Texas and New York on surprise billing. 

The National Taxpayers Union, which is also part of the coalition, spent $1.2 million in ads in December and January against the bill.

Envision and TeamHealth — physician staffing firms backed by Blackstone Group Inc. and KKR & Co. — spent a combined $54 million on ads last year targeting the proposal.

Lawmakers were hoping to attach the proposal to a spending bill that passed in December, but it was left out amid opposition from hospitals and providers and after a rival proposal was offered by the House Ways and Means Committee.

Pallone and Ways and Means Chairman Richard NealRichard Edmund NealDemocrats adjust language on child tax credit in relief bill Democrats scramble to rescue minimum wage hike Biden nominee previews post-Trump trade agenda MORE (D-Mass.) are meeting soon to discuss their plans and to find a path forward. 

Pallone and Alexander hope to include their proposal in a funding package that must pass by May 22. 

The Ways and Means proposal would still ban providers from sending surprise bills to patients, but it would let a neutral outside party determine how much the insurer will pay the doctor if an agreement can’t be reached privately.

The proposal is cautiously backed by some of the conservative groups opposing the Pallone-Alexander measure, though they are reluctant to offer their full-throated support until the legislative language is introduced.

"We are encouraged by the Ways and Means proposal and feel that it is a great first step," said Grace Morgan, director of external relations for the TPA.

"We look forward to working with Ways and Means Committee members to ensure that patients are protected once they release their forthcoming legislation."