GOP rips into Lynch, who refuses to discuss details in Clinton case

Attorney General Loretta Lynch on Tuesday refused to discuss her decision not to press charges against Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonForget the spin: Five unrefuted Mueller Report revelations Former senators launching effort to help Dems win rural votes Biden's announcement was a general election message, says political analyst MORE or her aides for mishandling classified information, outraging congressional Republicans.

The attorney general repeatedly declined to address details of the Clinton case during nearly five hours of testimony to the House Judiciary Committee. That stance drew scorn from GOP lawmakers, who accused her of stonewalling.

“Your refusal to answer questions regarding one of the most important investigations of someone who seeks to serve in the highest office in this land is an abdication of your responsibility,” Chairman Bob GoodlatteRobert (Bob) William GoodlatteTop Republican releases full transcript of Bruce Ohr interview It’s time for Congress to pass an anti-cruelty statute DOJ opinion will help protect kids from dangers of online gambling MORE (R-Va.) said midway through the hearing. “This is a very important issue about whether or not the Justice Department is going to uphold the rule of law in this country.

“You are the chief law enforcement officer of the United States, and the final decision regarding the prosecution is yours,” Goodlatte added as the hearing adjourned. “The fact that you were not able to provide us with answers regarding how that decision was reached is very concerning to members of this committee and the American public.”

Lynch referred questions to the FBI, declined to answer and otherwise dodged questions about specifics of the case at least 74 times, according to Rep. Dave Trott (R-Mich.), who said he was keeping track.

“I apologize for wasting so much time here, because it has not been very productive,” Trott said.

Lynch’s appearance Tuesday came just a few days after FBI Director James Comey faced an even rougher reception before the House Oversight Committee for his decision not to recommend charges against Clinton, the former secretary of State. The Justice Department’s decision was based on the unanimous recommendation of FBI investigators and federal prosecutors, Comey said.

But whereas Comey walked point by point through his legal reasoning while sparring with Republicans, Lynch refused to dip even a toe into the water.

“While I understand that this investigation has generated significant public interest, as attorney general, it would be inappropriate for me to comment further on the underlying facts of the investigation or the legal basis for the team’s recommendation,” she said in her opening statement.

Over the next several hours, she would repeat some version of that statement dozens of times.

“You’ve been very good at burning up the time and stonewalling,” said Rep. Blake FarentholdRandolph (Blake) Blake FarentholdMembers spar over sexual harassment training deadline Female Dems see double standard in Klobuchar accusations Lawmaker seeks to ban ex-members from lobbying until sexual harassment settlements repaid MORE (R-Texas). 

“I never thought I’d say this ... I miss Eric HolderEric Himpton HolderDemocrats are playing voters on their fantasies for impeachment Washington Post: 'Congress has every right to investigate' Trump Dems plot next move in Trump tax-return battle MORE.” Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.) said.

While House Republicans clashed bitterly with Holder, Lynch’s predecessor, “at least when he came here, he gave us answers,” Collins said.

Democrats refused to participate in the GOP’s line of questioning about Clinton’s email scandal, dismissing their focus as politically motivated ahead of the Republican National Convention next week. Clinton is the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee.

“We’re beating a dead horse here for political reasons,” said Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.).

Lofgren and other Democrats used their time to question Lynch about several other issues, including the outbreak of police-related violence, gun control and immigration.

The attorney general’s refusal to answer questions about the FBI’s recommendation reflects the tightrope she has been forced to walk in the Clinton case.

Lynch’s impartiality came into question after she had a private meeting with Clinton’s husband, Bill ClintonWilliam (Bill) Jefferson ClintonDemocrats are playing voters on their fantasies for impeachment George Conway backs up Clinton on Mueller report: 'If she's with the Constitution, I'm with her' Top Dem: Supreme Court has 'no role' in impeachment MORE, on an airport tarmac in Phoenix.

In the ensuing uproar, Lynch effectively took herself out of the case by stating that she would accept the FBI’s recommendation on whether to pursue charges against the former first lady.

Still, although she acknowledged that the airport meeting was a mistake, Lynch refused to completely recuse herself from the case, citing the precedent that it would set for high-profile cases going forward. 

The attorney general tried to argue Tuesday that while she had chosen to accept the FBI’s recommendation, she still maintained ultimate ownership of the decision not to levy charges — a distinction Republicans characterized as preposterous.

“If you commit and announce that you’ll abide by the FBI’s decision before they’ve even finished their investigation, then how can you say that ultimately it was your decision?” Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) asked.

“You are in charge of the Department of Justice. The buck stops with you. And I am concerned that you keep on saying that you have deferred the authority that by law is yours to Director Comey,” Rep. Jim SensenbrennerFrank (Jim) James SensenbrennerHouse fails to override Trump veto on border wall The 25 Republicans who defied Trump on emergency declaration Hillicon Valley: US threatens to hold intel from Germany over Huawei | GOP senator targets FTC over privacy | Bipartisan bill would beef up 'internet of things' security | Privacy groups seize on suspended NSA program | Tesla makes U-turn MORE (R-Wis.) said. 

The attacks were something of a reversal for Republicans, who had long argued that Lynch — a onetime political appointee under former President Clinton — shouldn’t be part of the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server while at State. 

Last year, 44 congressional Republicans asked the Justice Department to appoint a special prosecutor to oversee the investigation.

In the wake of her announcement that she would defer to the FBI, some critics of Lynch saw a glimmer of hope that Comey, a longtime Republican, might be emboldened to recommend charges.

But Republicans argued Tuesday that Lynch’s decision to take a back seat was evidence of a double standard for the Clintons.

“Your actions contributed to this belief that the system is rigged,” Jordan said, after pressing Lynch to admit that she had not made a similar statement in any other case.

“You showed that this case was different, and the law is supposed to treat every single person the same. Your announcement, by definition, made this thing entirely different.”