Senate Intel chief slams ex-CIA director for timing of claims about Trump-Russia ties
The Senate Intelligence Committee’s top Republican lambasted former CIA Director John Brennan on Thursday for the timing of his claims about possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russia.
In a statement, Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) pointed to a New York Times op-ed published Thursday in which Brennan describes President Trump’s claims of “no collusion” between his campaign and Russia as “hogwash.”
“Director Brennan’s recent statements purport to know, as fact, that the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power,” Burr said Thursday, questioning why, if Brennan’s assertion is based on actual intelligence, it was not included in the unclassified intelligence assessment released in early 2017.
“If his statement is based on intelligence he has seen since leaving office, it constitutes an intelligence breach. If he has some other personal knowledge of or evidence of collusion, it should be disclosed to the Special Counsel, not The New York Times,” Burr said. Burr added that Trump has the “full authority” to revoke security clearance if the statements were “purely political and based on conjecture.”
In his op-ed, Brennan, who helmed the CIA when the intelligence community released its assessment of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, wrote that he has learned of “highly suspicious dalliances of some American citizens with people affiliated with the Russian intelligence services” through “the reporting of an open and free press” since his time in government.
Trump on Wednesday announced in a statement read by White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, that he was revoking Brennan’s security clearance, citing national security concerns, though the move was widely viewed as an effort by the president to silence one of his most fervent critics. Trump, in a statement, accused Brennan of using his status to make “unfounded and outrageous” charges about his administration.
Sanders denied that Trump was working to crack down on his critics.
Burr’s reaction — an apparent defense of the president, albeit with caveats — conflicts with that of his Democratic counterpart on the committee, Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.).
Warner on Wednesday accused Trump of setting a “dangerous precedent” and politicizing national security.
Together, Burr and Warner are leading the Senate panel’s investigation into Russian interference in the election, a probe that thus far has set a distinctly bipartisan tone, in contrast with the committee’s counterpart in the House.
The intelligence community assessment released last year concluded that Russia waged a broad campaign to interfere in the election to undermine U.S. democracy, damage Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s campaign, and help Trump win the White House.
The findings triggered a federal investigation into Russian interference — including probing whether there was collusion between Trump’s campaign Moscow — now being led by special counsel Robert Mueller.
Burr’s reaction echoes those of other Republicans who have described Brennan’s actions as inappropriate.
“He’s acted like a butthead. He’s acted like a political hack and not a national security professional,” Sen. Joe Kennedy (R-La.) told reporters Wednesday.
The Hill has removed its comment section, as there are many other forums for readers to participate in the conversation. We invite you to join the discussion on Facebook and Twitter.