Top Dems: DOJ position on Whitaker appointment 'fatally flawed'

Top Dems: DOJ position on Whitaker appointment 'fatally flawed'
© Youtube screenshot

Top Democrats are slamming the Justice Department's justification for President TrumpDonald John TrumpJustice Department preparing for Mueller report as soon as next week: reports Smollett lawyers declare 'Empire' star innocent Pelosi asks members to support resolution against emergency declaration MORE's appointment of new acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker as "fatally flawed."

Reps. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) and Adam SchiffAdam Bennett SchiffPinterest blocks all vaccine-related searches in effort to combat anti-vax content Trump’s overreach is making a weaker presidency White House, GOP defend Trump emergency declaration MORE (D-Calif.) -- the top Democrats on the House Judiciary and Intelligence panels, respectively -- as well as Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Dianne FeinsteinDianne Emiel FeinsteinFeinstein says she thinks Biden will run after meeting with him Trump judicial nominee Neomi Rao seeks to clarify past remarks on date rape Bottom Line MORE (D-Calif.), argued in a statement that the DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) rested too heavily on the 1998 Vacancies Reform Act to make their case.

Democrats and critics alike argue that it is against the Constitution for Whitaker to serve since he is not a Senate-confirmed official.

"The Office of Legal Counsel opinion released yesterday attempts to justify the appointment of Matthew Whitaker as acting attorney general. By relying exclusively on the Vacancies Reform Act and twisting the plain language of the Constitution, the opinion’s argument is fatally flawed," they wrote in Thursday a statement. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“The reason for our government’s consistent practice with respect to the nation’s chief law enforcement officer since then is simple: For more than a century, the executive branch has understood, and Congress has agreed, that the attorney general, including one serving in an acting capacity, is a principal officer who must be nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate," they continued.

The lawmakers alleged that Trump had purposefully bypassed Deputy Attorney General Rod RosensteinRod Jay RosensteinDems seize on Times bombshell to push allegations of Trump obstruction Trump calls Andrew McCabe a 'poor man's J. Edgar Hoover' CNN: DOJ preparing to announce end of Mueller probe as soon as next week MORE, the official next in line to take the helm of the Justice Department (DOJ) after the president fired Jeff SessionsJefferson (Jeff) Beauregard SessionsDems seize on Times bombshell to push allegations of Trump obstruction Mueller report may be 'anti-climactic,' says ex-intelligence director CNN ripped for hiring former Republican operative as political editor: 'WTF?!?!' MORE. They say he instead chose Whitaker because the president wanted a "political operative to serve his own interests." Whitaker now oversees special counsel Robert MuellerRobert Swan MuellerSasse: US should applaud choice of Mueller to lead Russia probe MORE's investigation instead of Rosenstein.

"President Trump purposefully skipped [Rosenstein] and every other individual who meets these conditions," the statement reads.

Democrats have also called on Whitaker to recuse himself from overseeing the probe, pointing to a series of comments he made prior to joining the DOJ that criticize the investigation he is now overseeing.

This statement comes after Maryland's attorney general asked a federal judge on Tuesday to block Whitaker's appointment, arguing that Rosenstein should instead return to his role of overseeing the high-profile investigation examining Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

In response, the OLC issued a 20-page memo arguing that his appointment is within the bounds of the law, citing past legal precedent as well as the Vacancies Reform Act.

Democrats, however, said knocked the OLC for identifying one case in which an individual served as acting AG without Senate approval -- and that was during Andrew Johnson's administration in 1866, shortly after the Civil War ended.

This special case, they noted, was "four years before the Justice Department’s founding and a century before the DOJ succession law was enacted."

"The attorney general must be Senate confirmed, plain and simple. This can’t be allowed to stand," the Democrats concluded.