SPONSORED:

Dems zero in on Trump and Russia

Democrats vowed to introduce tough oversight of President TrumpDonald TrumpWhite House denies pausing military aid package to Ukraine Poll: 30 percent of GOP voters believe Trump will 'likely' be reinstated this year Black Secret Service agent told Trump it was offensive to hold rally in Tulsa on Juneteenth: report MORE if they won back the House majority, and they are signaling a new aggressiveness to meet their promises.

Michael Cohen, Trump’s former personal attorney, is slated to testify before Congress publicly next month, an event that promises high drama as lawmakers question him on Trump’s dealings in Russia and his involvement in a scheme to pay off women alleging affairs with him during the 2016 campaign.

ADVERTISEMENT

Meanwhile, dueling reports have given Democrats momentum in further probing Trump’s actions and his conversations with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Taken together, the developments underscore the new political reality facing Trump as he readies for his reelection bid in 2020.

Trump on Monday was forced to deny ever working for the Russian government following a bombshell New York Times report that the FBI opened an investigation into whether he was secretly being directed by the Kremlin shortly after Director James ComeyJames Brien ComeyMystery surrounds Justice's pledge on journalist records NYT publisher: DOJ phone records seizure a 'dangerous incursion' on press freedom Trump DOJ seized phone records of New York Times reporters MORE’s ouster.

“I never worked for Russia,” Trump told reporters at the White House before leaving to speak at a farmers convention in New Orleans. “Not only did I never work for Russia, I think it's a disgrace that you even asked that question, because it's a whole big fat hoax.”

It has long been expected that House Democrats would launch full-scale investigations into Trump and his administration with their newfound subpoena and oversight powers. The announcement late last week that Cohen would testify before the House Oversight and Reform Committee on Feb. 7 marked the first major power play by Democrats, just a week into the new Congress.

“The Congress doesn’t meet but so many days in a year. And all I’m saying is that we’ve gotta hit the ground, not running, but flying,” Rep. Elijah CummingsElijah Eugene CummingsDemocrats plot next move after GOP sinks Jan. 6 probe Lawmakers press AbbVie CEO on increased US prices of two drugs Overnight Health Care: AstraZeneca may have included outdated data on vaccine trial, officials say | Pelosi says drug pricing measure under discussion for infrastructure package | Biden administration extends special ObamaCare enrollment until August MORE (D-Md.), the committee’s chair, said on CBS’s “60 Minutes” Sunday evening.

Some Republicans have criticized Cummings for calling Cohen to testify, noting he is a cooperating witness in special counsel Robert MuellerRobert (Bob) MuellerSenate Democrats urge Garland not to fight court order to release Trump obstruction memo Why a special counsel is guaranteed if Biden chooses Yates, Cuomo or Jones as AG Barr taps attorney investigating Russia probe origins as special counsel MORE’s investigation into Russian election interference. Cummings has said questions will be limited so as not to interfere with the probe.

A flurry of investigations promises to dog Trump over the next several months. This includes Mueller’s inquiry into possible coordination between the Trump campaign and Moscow, which is widely assumed to be in its later stages. It also includes the investigation into Cohen’s payments to women claiming affairs with Trump run by federal prosecutors in New York City.

Trump has seethed over the special counsel’s investigation for more than a year, denying collusion between his campaign and Russia and accusing Mueller of running a partisan “witch hunt” in search of a crime.

Recent revelations are likely to spawn more Russia-related congressional probes.

Democrats are promising to dig for more information about Trump’s official interactions with Putin after The Washington Post reported that he sought to conceal the details of those conversations from others in his administration, including in one instance taking a notes from an interpreter who was present at a 2017 meeting with the Russian president.

The report has revived scrutiny of last July’s Helsinki summit, at which Trump sparked bipartisan condemnation for his genial attitude toward Putin and unwillingness to challenge him publicly on election interference following the closed-door meeting.

Director of National Intelligence Dan CoatsDaniel (Dan) Ray CoatsFormer Trump officials including Fiona Hill helped prepare Biden for Putin summit: report Will the real Lee Hamiltons and Olympia Snowes please stand up? Experts see 'unprecedented' increase in hackers targeting electric grid MORE acknowledged days after the summit that he didn’t know what had transpired during the one-on-one meeting and signaled weeks later that he still did not have a full accounting.

House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Eliot EngelEliot Lance EngelDemocrats call on Blinken to set new sexual misconduct policies at State Department Lawmakers on hot mic joke 'aisle hog' Engel absent from Biden address: 'He'd wait all day' Bowman to deliver progressive response to Biden's speech to Congress MORE (D-N.Y.) said his panel would hold hearings on Trump’s “bizarre relationship” with Putin. Two congressional panels are also considering subpoenaing the American interpreter present at the Helsinki meeting to testify — a proposal swiftly defeated by Republicans in the last Congress.

Trump has reacted angrily to the developments, blaming the news media for writing unfair stories about him and claiming he has been tougher on Russia than any modern president. The Post report came on the heels of a Times article detailing that the FBI opened an investigation into whether Trump had been working on behalf of the Kremlin in 2017. There has been no public evidence that the president ever worked on behalf of the Russian government, and it remains unknown whether Mueller has kept the inquiry open, according to the Times.

On Monday, Trump lashed out at the FBI officials who opened the investigation into his conduct as “scoundrels” and “dirty cops.”

Trump has also dismissed the significance of Cohen’s impending testimony, accusing his former lawyer of peddling a false narrative in hopes of receiving a lighter prison sentence.

Cohen pleaded guilty to a slew of federal charges last year, including one count of lying to Congress about plans to build a Trump property in Moscow. He is expected to report to federal prison to serve a three-year sentence in March.

The House Intelligence Committee has also expressed interest in bringing Cohen to testify behind closed doors as part of an investigation into Russian interference that Democratic leaders are restarting after Republicans shuttered it last spring.

“We’re in discussions with his counsel, and that’s all I can say at this point,” House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam SchiffAdam Bennett SchiffCyber concerns dominate Biden-Putin summit Senate on collision course over Trump DOJ subpoenas Lawmakers urge Biden to be tough on cybersecurity during summit with Putin MORE (D-Calif.) told The Hill when asked about negotiations to bring Cohen before the committee late last week.

Democrats have already fired a warning shot against Trump ahead of Cohen’s appearance after the president told Fox News’s Jeanine Pirro in an interview that Cohen “should give information maybe on his father-in-law, because that’s the one that people want to look at.”

“Our nation’s laws prohibit efforts to discourage, intimidate, or otherwise pressure a witness not to provide testimony to Congress,” Cummings, Schiff and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said over the weekend.

“The President should make no statement or take any action to obstruct Congress’ independent oversight and investigative efforts, including by seeking to discourage any witness from testifying in response to a duly authorized request from Congress,” they said.