Eric Holder: 'We're really at the beginning' of questions about Trump obstructing justice

Former Attorney General Eric HolderEric Himpton HolderCongress and contempt: What you need to know Congress and contempt: What you need to know The Hill's Morning Report - Democrats wonder: Can Nadler handle the Trump probe? MORE said Monday that "we're really at the beginning, maybe the middle" of questions about whether President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump defends Stephanopolous interview Trump defends Stephanopolous interview Buttigieg on offers of foreign intel: 'Just call the FBI' MORE obstructed justice. 

Holder made the remark during an interview on MSNBC, one day after Attorney General William Barr said in a letter to Congress that special counsel Robert MuellerRobert (Bob) Swan MuellerKamala Harris says her Justice Dept would have 'no choice' but to prosecute Trump for obstruction Kamala Harris says her Justice Dept would have 'no choice' but to prosecute Trump for obstruction Dem committees win new powers to investigate Trump MORE did not reach a conclusion while investigating whether Trump obstructed justice. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Barr also said in the letter that he and Deputy Attorney General Rod RosensteinRod RosensteinGOP group urges Republicans to speak out on obstruction claims against Trump in new ad GOP group urges Republicans to speak out on obstruction claims against Trump in new ad Judiciary Democrats announce series of hearings on Mueller report MORE determined there was insufficient evidence that Trump obstructed justice.

Holder on Monday called for more detailed findings from Mueller's report to be released publicly.

“With regard to obstruction, I think we're really at the beginning, maybe the middle of this whole process. Findings have been made. We need to see what those were. We need to see exactly what was the nature of the interaction between Bob Mueller and Bill Barr," he said.

“And then we also need to understand, how was it that Bill Barr reached these conclusions? What were the things that he went through? What laws did he apply? What rules did he apply? How did he interpret the appropriate rules and statutes? How did he apply the facts," Holder continued.

Holder added during the interview that Congress and the American people "are entitled to hear substantially more" than Barr's letter to Congress.

"This is just a 4-page memo that makes really consequential determinations and it seems to me that the American people and Congress are entitled to hear substantially more than simply this document," Holder said.