Special counsel Robert MuellerRobert (Bob) MuellerAn unquestioning press promotes Rep. Adam Schiff's book based on Russia fiction Senate Democrats urge Garland not to fight court order to release Trump obstruction memo Why a special counsel is guaranteed if Biden chooses Yates, Cuomo or Jones as AG MORE considered charging Trump campaign officials with a campaign finance violation over the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting with a Russian lawyer, but did not think he had sufficient evidence.
Mueller’s report, released Thursday, says investigators believed that the offer of political “dirt” on Democratic presidential candidate Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonNo Hillary — the 'Third Way' is the wrong way The dangerous erosion of Democratic Party foundations The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - Democrats see victory in a voting rights defeat MORE could be a violation of a ban on campaign contributions from a foreign government.
That federal statute also applies to “'an express or implied promise to make a [foreign-source] contribution,'" and that the promise of damaging information meant to help Trump could be considered a “'thing of value'” under the ban, Mueller wrote.
And the presence at the meeting of officials like former campaign chairman Paul ManafortPaul John ManafortUS sanctions four Ukrainians for aiding Russian influence operations Manafort book set for August publication Accused spy's lawyers say plans to leave country were over Trump, not arrest MORE and Trump's son-in-law Jared KushnerJared Corey KushnerDonald Trump slams Jan. 6 panel after Ivanka Trump interview request: 'They'll go after children' Kushner investment firm raises more than B: report Trump: Netanyahu 'never wanted peace' with Palestinians MORE, who's now a senior White House adviser, signals that the campaign was hoping to benefit from that information, according to Mueller’s report.
“The communications setting up the meeting and the attendance by high-level Campaign representatives support an inference that the Campaign anticipated receiving derogatory documents and information from official Russian sources that could assist candidate Trump's electoral prospects,” the report says.
British publicist Rob Goldstone had reached out to Donald Trump Jr.Don TrumpRittenhouse to speak at Turning Point USA event White House calls Jan. 6 text revelations 'disappointing' Court orders release of some redacted passages of Mueller report MORE, the president's eldest son, to set up the meeting during the 2016 campaign. Goldstone wrote in emails that Russia had "'official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to [Trump Jr.'s] father,'” as "part of Russia and its government's support to Mr. Trump.'”
“[I]f it's what you say I love it especially later in the summer,” Trump Jr. replied.
“Trump Jr. appears to have accepted that offer and to have arranged a meeting to receive those materials,” Mueller wrote in his report. “Documentary evidence in the form of email chains supports the inference that Kushner and Manafort were aware of that purpose and attended the June 9 meeting anticipating the receipt of helpful information to the Campaign from Russian sources.”
However, the special counsel’s office “did not obtain admissible evidence” that could show to legal standards that the campaign officials knew that the action was illegal, according to the report.
Mueller's team also believed it would probably have difficulty proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the value of the promised political dirt would exceed “the threshold for a criminal violation.”
“The investigation has not developed evidence that the participants in the meeting were familiar with the foreign-contribution ban” or the federal law applying to the meeting, and “does not have strong evidence of surreptitious behavior or efforts at concealment at the time of the June 9 meeting,” the report states.
News of the Trump Tower meeting, first revealed by The New York Times in 2017, drew immediate backlash from Democrats, who argued it was evidence of connections between the Trump campaign and Russia.
Mueller concluded in his report that they investigators found "no documentary evidence" that Trump had prior knowledge of the June 2016 meeting.