The federal prosecutor who is looking into the origins of the Russia investigation has begun looking into former CIA Director John BrennanJohn Owen BrennanClinton lawyer's indictment reveals 'bag of tricks' Still in the game: Will Durham's report throw a slow curveball at key political players? UFOs are an intriguing science problem; Congress must act accordingly MORE, The New York Times reported Thursday, citing three people briefed on the matter.
U.S. Attorney John DurhamJohn DurhamBarr-Durham investigation again fails to produce a main event Clinton lawyer's indictment reveals 'bag of tricks' Attorney charged in Durham investigation pleads not guilty MORE, who is leading the inquiry, has asked for Brennan's emails, call logs and other documents, a person told the Times.
He is reportedly seeking to learn what Brennan told other officials about the CIA's opinion of a now-infamous dossier that made claims about Russia and figures in President TrumpDonald TrumpJan. 6 committee chair says panel will issue a 'good number' of additional subpoenas Overnight Defense & National Security — Presented by AM General — Pentagon officials prepare for grilling Biden nominates head of Africa CDC to lead global AIDS response MORE's orbit.
The Times reported that Durham is also looking at whether Brennan privately contradicted comments he made about the dossier and conclusions about Russian interference.
The people told the paper that the investigation was ongoing and it was not clear whether any crimes had been found.
Brennan has previously told MSNBC that he would answer questions from Durham if they were asked.
“I feel good about what it is we did as an intelligence community, and I feel very confident and comfortable with what I did, so I have no qualms whatsoever about talking with investigators who are going to be looking at this in a fair and appropriate manner,” he reportedly said.
Earlier this month, a report was released on an internal watchdog probe on FBI surveillance during the 2016 campaign. It found that the decision to investigate Trump campaign associates was not motivated by political bias but found “significant inaccuracies and omissions” in the bureau's application to monitor a Trump campaign official.