Democrat asks intelligence director if Trump's personal debt is security problem

Democrat asks intelligence director if Trump's personal debt is security problem
© Greg Nash

A Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee is pressing the director of national intelligence (DNI) to assess whether President TrumpDonald TrumpFormer New York Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver dead at 77 Biden, Democrats losing ground with independent and suburban voters: poll Bipartisan Senate group discusses changes to election law MORE's personal debt could be a vulnerability to U.S. national security and interests.

Rep. Raja KrishnamoorthiSubramanian (Raja) Raja KrishnamoorthiEquilibrium/Sustainability — Fire calls infrastructural integrity into question FDA must address endocrine-disrupting phthalates: House Oversight In their own words: Lawmakers, staffers remember Jan. 6 insurrection MORE (D-Ill.) in a pair of letters Thursday asked DNI John RatcliffeJohn Lee RatcliffeWe need scientific analysis of satellite data on UAP Set to make history on UFOs, Congress revives the '1 percent' doctrine This Thanksgiving, skip the political food fights and talk UFOs instead MORE and his predecessor, former DNI Dan CoatsDaniel (Dan) Ray CoatsAn independent commission should review our National Defense Strategy Overnight Hillicon Valley — Scrutiny over Instagram's impact on teens Former national security officials warn antitrust bills could help China in tech race MORE, to detail whether Trump's personal debts and loans could be exploited by foreign adversaries.

Krishnamoorthi referenced a recent New York Times bombshell report about Trump's tax returns, which found that the president has personal debt exceeding $400 million, most of which is coming due in the next few years. Trump, who has long cited an IRS audit as the reason for not releasing his tax returns, might owe an additional $100 million if there is an adverse ruling by the tax-collecting agency, according to the report.


"Some former intelligence officials have already weighed in on the manners in which these debts, combined with his ongoing international business interests, pose significant points of pressure and potential compromise for the President in dealings with foreign adversaries," Krishnamoorthi wrote.

"It is based on these revelations that I request that you share your assessment as to whether or not such financial vulnerabilities could compromise American public health and safety," the Illinois Democrat added.

Specifically, Krishnamoorthi asked Ratcliffe and Coats whether significant personal debt for those working in national security increases their risk of being target by foreign adversaries, whether senior public officials with millions in debt like the president face heightened counterintelligence risks and whether such financial exposure would typically disqualify individuals from receiving a security clearance.

The Intelligence Committee member asked both Ratcliffe and Coats to respond to his letter by Oct 13.

Krishnamoorthi's letters come as some former law enforcement figures like former FBI Director James ComeyJames Brien ComeyHillary 2024? Given the competition, she may be the Dems' best hope Trump draws attention with admission he 'fired Comey' Countering the ongoing Republican delusion MORE have warned that a government official with significant personal debt could pose a risk to national security.

Comey, a vocal Trump critic who was fired by the president in 2017, testified before the Senate on Wednesday that significant debt is taken into consideration when reviewing an individual’s background for a security clearance.

"A person's financial situation could make them vulnerable to coercion by an adversary and allow an adversary to do what we try to do to foreign government officials we find are indebted, which is to try to recruit them to our side," Comey said during a remote testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

During a separate part of the hearing, Comey was questioned about Trump's financial ties to countries like Russia and whether this may influence his foreign policy.

“I don’t know whether the Russians have something over President Trump, but it is difficult to explain his conduct, his statements in any other way, especially as a refusal to criticize [Russian President] Vladimir Putin," Comey responded. "So it raises significant questions and obviously the question is only deepened by disclosure, if it is true, of significant indebtedness."

Trump has defended his finances while pushing back on the Times report earlier this week after the newspaper reported that he paid effectively no income taxes in 10 of 15 years before he was elected president in 2016 and paid $750 in income tax in both 2016 and 2017.

The president maintained Monday that he has "paid many millions of dollars in taxes but was entitled, like everyone else, to depreciation & tax credits" while claiming that he has "very little debt compared to the value of assets."