Sen. Bond says DHS shouldn’t oversee cybersecurity

Unlike the Homeland Security cyber bill, under the Bond-Hatch bill there would be no White House cybersecurity coordinator. The Senators expressed concern that creating such a position would impede Congressional oversight. According to Lieberman, current White House cyber czar Howard Schmidt has repeatedly refused to testify before Congress, citing executive privilege.

Bond’s bill would also create a cybersecurity center housed at the Department of Energy that would allow critical private sector entities like utilities, financial services firms and power companies to meet and share information on cyber attacks and best practices. The center would not be subject to the Freedom of Information Act or antitrust challenges so companies would feel free to discuss the challenges and attacks they are facing.

“They won’t come in and open up with each other if they don’t have that,” Bond said.

Bond acknowledged the existence of more than 20 competing pieces of
cybersecurity legislation, but said unlike the
other bills, his is not part of a “turf battle.” He said senior
intelligence officials have expressed concerns to him about some of the
other bills and their potential adverse impact on network security in
the intelligence community. Bond and Hatch both sit on the Senate
Intelligence Committee.

“If there are further things to do, we’ll deal with those later,” Bond said. “But we need a single point of contact controlling cybersecurity and a forum for the private sector to share information, threat warnings and best practices.”


The Hill has removed its comment section, as there are many other forums for readers to participate in the conversation. We invite you to join the discussion on Facebook and Twitter.

Most Popular

Load more


See all Video