Unions push controversial copyright bills

{mosads}The bills would empower the government and copyright holders to demand that Internet service providers, search engines and payment processors block access to websites “dedicated” to copyright infringements.

“The illegal sale or display of counterfeit goods or copyrighted materials costs the United States numerous jobs and billions of dollars a year,” Edwin Hill, international president of the electrical workers group, wrote in a letter last week.

The AFL’s Mark Ayers said copyright infringement hurts workers in industries such as book publishing, computer software, sports leagues, entertainment, clean energy, pharmaceuticals and electronics manufacturing.

But the bills have caused a massive backlash as Internet companies and consumer advocacy groups warn they could stifle innovation and lead to censorship of the Web.

“It is a shame the unions don’t recognize the nature of the bills goes far beyond what is necessary to protect the jobs of their members,” said Art Brodsky, a spokesman for consumer advocacy group Public Knowledge. “There are ways to combat what the industry sees as piracy without extending the reach of the U.S. to every website in the world nor giving companies the authority to shut down websites’ financial support without any judicial rulings or even the hint of proof.”


The Hill has removed its comment section, as there are many other forums for readers to participate in the conversation. We invite you to join the discussion on Facebook and Twitter.

See all Hill.TV See all Video

Most Popular

Load more


See all Video