"In addition, to the extent that either of your agencies believes that the transaction should be approved subject to certain conditions, such conditions should only impact the parties to the transaction and be narrowly tailored to address any specific harm attributable to the transaction."
The Justice Department sued to block the $39 billion deal, arguing that it would violate antitrust laws by stifling competition in the wireless industry. AT&T has vowed to fight the lawsuit in court but has indicated it is willing to negotiate with the Justice Department to address the agency's concerns.
The FCC is still conducting its own review of the deal.
In a separate letter last week, Rep. Todd YoungTodd Christopher YoungOvernight Defense & National Security — Presented by Boeing — Senators to take up defense bill Wednesday Schumer: Time is 'now' to repeal Iraq War resolution It's time to give Medicare beneficiaries the opportunity and choice of recovery in the home MORE (R-Alaska) requested information from the Justice Department about its decision to file the lawsuit.
"A modern wireless network is an essential part of the free market economy and this merger could potentially provide better coverage and higher quality service to America's urban and rural areas," he wrote.
He said he was willing to work with the wireless providers and regulators to reach a settlement.
The Justice Department responded earlier this month to a similar request from Energy and Commerce Republicans to explain its decision to block the merger. The agency summarized its complaint against AT&T but did not provide any additional information, citing a policy against discussing ongoing litigation.