House Dems hail ‘courage’ of Wikipedia NSA lawsuit

A pair of House Democrats is cheering on the Wikimedia Foundation and other groups that launched a new legal challenge against the National Security Agency.

Reps. John ConyersJohn James ConyersThe Hill's 12:30 Report: Dems release first transcripts from impeachment probe witnesses Hispanic Caucus dedicates Day of the Dead altar to migrants who died in US custody Today On Rising: The media beclowns themselves on Baghdadi MORE (D-Mich.) and Sheila Jackson LeeSheila Jackson LeeConsequential GOP class of 1994 all but disappears Video of Greta Thunberg crossing paths with Trump at UN goes viral Lewandowski: House testimony shows I'd be 'a fighter' in the Senate MORE (D-Texas) “have long been troubled that these programs appear to sidestep the requirements of the Fourth Amendment,” they said in a joint statement on Tuesday, after the foundation behind Wikipedia filed its suit alongside a handful of other organizations.


“We applaud the courage of the litigants in this case, and look forward to their day in court,” the lawmakers added.

The groups are challenging the NSA’s collection of vast amounts of Internet users’ data by tapping into the “backbone” of fiber cables and connection switches that make up the global Internet. Along with the Wikimedia Foundation, the NSA is being sued by eight groups, including The Nation magazine, Amnesty International and the PEN American Center. They are all being represented by the American Civil Liberties Union. 

The NSA’s work to vacuum up information about Internet users has aroused some opposition from Congress but has largely been overshadowed by ongoing work to end its bulk collection of Americans’ phone records.

Conyers, who is the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, has been a leading figure in that fight and helped to draft the USA Freedom Act during the last session of Congress, which would have forced the NSA to get people’s records from their phone company only after obtaining a court order.

That effort is still ongoing and faces a critical deadline of June 1. 

“That is the necessary first step in a long struggle to roll back the power of the surveillance state and restore our civil liberties,” he and Lee said on Tuesday.

“This case represents the next fight.”