Broadcom is trying to reassure members of Congress about its proposed takeover of Qualcomm as an interagency panel considers whether to block the deal on national security grounds.
Hock Tan, the CEO of the Singapore-based firm, sent a letter to lawmakers on Friday promising that the acquisition poses no threat to the U.S. leadership in innovation.
His letter follows an announcement by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS), which includes representatives from several U.S. agencies and departments, said that it was concerned that the takeover would cause the U.S. to fall behind in the global race to build reliable 5G wireless networks — threatening U.S. security.
Tan also promised that if the deal goes through, the combined company will not sell any assets to foreign entities.
The CFIUS took the rare step this week of publicly intervening in the hostile takeover, ordering Qualcomm to postpone its annual shareholders meeting just days before it was scheduled to take place. Broadcom was expected to win a majority of seats on Qualcomm’s board of directors at the meeting.
In a letter to Qualcomm, the CFIUS said it was concerned that the deal posed a threat to U.S. national security. The panel said that if Broadcom decided to slash Qualcomm’s research and development investments it could lead to Chinese competitors like Huawei surpassing the U.S. in innovation.
The CFIUS, which is led by Treasury Secretary Steven MnuchinSteven MnuchinMajor Russian hacking group linked to ransomware attack on Sinclair: report The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Alibaba - Biden jumps into frenzied Dem spending talks Former Treasury secretaries tried to resolve debt limit impasse in talks with McConnell, Yellen: report MORE, can recommend that a president block a business deal on national security grounds, though its objections can also unravel deals before the CFIUS findings get to the White House.
Broadcom argued Friday that it was committed to building on the San Diego company’s record. It also noted that Qualcomm is facing scrutiny from regulators around the world about what some say are anticompetitive licensing agreements that the company uses to fund its R&D investments.
“There is no truth to Qualcomm’s argument that its anticompetitive licensing practices are needed to fund a robust R&D effort. None of the industry’s other great innovators violate the law in order to finance their R&D,” Tan wrote.
A Qualcomm spokeswoman was not immediately available for comment.