GOP pushes back on net neutrality bill at testy hearing

GOP pushes back on net neutrality bill at testy hearing
© Greg Nash

GOP lawmakers pushed back on Democrats' proposed net neutrality bill at a testy hearing on Tuesday, calling the legislation "extreme" and overly partisan, while saying it would be dead on arrival in the Senate. 

Rep. Bob Latta (R-Ohio), ranking member of the House Energy and Commerce technology subcommittee, called the bill a "non-starter," pointing out that it opens up the broadband industry to regulations that Republicans have long opposed. 

ADVERTISEMENT

"Instead of engaging with us to try to solve the problem, my colleagues have retrenched back to the most extreme position in this debate," Latta said. "[The bill] has no chance of even passing the Senate or being signed into law." 

The Save the Internet Act, introduced by Democrats last week, would restore Obama-era regulations on the broadband industry.

The bill would codify the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) 2015 Open Internet Order into law, reigniting a debate between Republicans and Democrats over whether the FCC should have the legal authority to enforce net neutrality rules. 

Under the Democrats' bill, the broadband industry would be classified as a telecommunications service under Title II of the Communications Act — a designation which opens up the industry to more stringent regulations enforced by the FCC. 

The "Title II" designation has long been a sticking point for Republicans. 

Republicans at the hearing repeatedly promoted a trio of bills recently introduced by Latta, Rep. Greg WaldenGregory (Greg) Paul WaldenTop Republican rejects Democratic chairman's approach to stopping surprise medical bills Lawmakers hit Trump administration for including tech legal shield in trade negotiations CBO: Pelosi bill to lower drug prices saves Medicare 5 billion MORE (R-Ore.) and Rep. Cathy McMorris RodgersCathy McMorris RodgersSocial determinants of health — health care isn't just bugs and bacteria Lawmakers deride FTC settlement as weak on Facebook Overnight Energy: Fight over fuel standards intensifies | Democrats grill Trump officials over rule rollback | California official blasts EPA chief over broken talks | Former EPA official says Wheeler lied to Congress MORE (R-Wash.), which would reimpose some net neutrality rules without using "Title II." 

McMorris Rodgers called the bills "reasonable," while witnesses and some Democratic lawmakers criticized them as weak on internet service providers. 

The hearing was marked by sharp digs on both sides, with Democrats flexing their powers in the majority while some Republicans directed their criticism toward witnesses appearing before the panel. 

At one point, Rep. Billy LongWilliam (Billy) H. LongLawmakers from both sides of the aisle mourn Cummings Lawmakers toast Greta Van Susteren's new show Trump honors Stanley Cup champions, talks impeachment, Turkey MORE (R-Mo.) pressed Matt Wood, the vice president of policy and general counsel with consumer advocacy group Free Press, over his organization's tactics on Twitter.

Long asked Wood, a longtime advocate for net neutrality rules, to reveal "how many fundraising emails" his organizations sent out and how much money it raised through those emails. 

The Missouri Republican went on to accuse Free Press and other consumer groups of "attacking" him on Twitter over his support for "bipartisan legislation" on net neutrality. 

"Quit attacking people on Twitter when we are trying to do things in a bipartisan fashion," Long said. 

Fight for the Future, another group that supports strong net neutrality rules, shortly after tweeted, "Aw, thanks for the shout out." 

A coalition of consumer groups has started to intensify pressure on lawmakers to support the net neutrality bill, in particular focusing on the only Democrat who did not support the companion legislation in the Senate — Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.). 

Rep. Mike DoyleMichael (Mike) F. DoyleHillicon Valley: Google, Reddit to testify on tech industry protections | Trump joins Amazon-owned Twitch | House to vote on bill to combat foreign interference Reddit, Google to testify before House panel on tech's legal protections Consequential GOP class of 1994 all but disappears MORE (Pa.), the top Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce technology panel, maintained that Democrats are interested in working with Republicans on the bill.

He slammed the Republicans for failing to "inform" their Democratic colleagues about the bills in advance.

"After being in the majority for so long, it might be difficult for some of my colleagues to recognize that they’re not anymore," Doyle said. "A better approach would be to sit down and get in touch with us before you drop bills." 

Rep. Darren SotoDarren Michael SotoOvernight Health Care — Presented by National Taxpayers Union — Buttigieg targets Warren, Sanders on health care ahead of debate | Judge overturns ObamaCare transgender protections | Poll sees support drop for 'Medicare for All' Hispanic voters push campaigns to address gun violence Ginsburg, Patrick Dempsey among honorees at Congressional Families Cancer Prevention Program MORE (D-Fla.) called the bill an "opening offer," indicating that he and other Democrats are open to "amendments" from Republicans on the committee. 

"We’ll have a markup so this bill’s not just messaging," Soto said, adding it is "not true" to say that there is no chance the bill will pass.

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle expressed interest in net neutrality rules that would prevent internet service providers from blocking, slowing down or speeding up any content. But the parties remain deeply divided over how to prevent that form of web discrimination.

Doyle told reporters after the hearing he anticipates a subcommittee markup before the end of the month. 

Updated at 4:32 p.m.