SPONSORED:

White House getting pushback on possible government-owned 5G network

White House getting pushback on possible government-owned 5G network
© istock

The Trump administration is getting pushback from industry groups, both sides of the aisle and even internally about the Pentagon's moves toward a possible 5G network owned and operated by the government.

President TrumpDonald John TrumpBiden to nominate Linda Thomas-Greenfield for UN ambassador: reports Scranton dedicates 'Joe Biden Way' to honor president-elect Kasich: Republicans 'either in complete lockstep' or 'afraid' of Trump MORE's chief of staff, Mark MeadowsMark Randall MeadowsOvernight Defense: Pentagon set for tighter virus restrictions as top officials tests positive | Military sees 11th COVID-19 death | House Democrats back Senate language on Confederate base names Trump administration revives talk of action on birthright citizenship House Democrats back slower timeline for changing Confederate base names MORE, is reportedly leading a pressure campaign for the White House's favored candidate, wireless company Rivada Networks, in its efforts to construct a 5G network, though Rivada says such a network should not be government-owned.

The Pentagon’s deadline for a request for information (RFI) on accelerating spectrum sharing and 5G deployment was Oct. 19, and Rivada, which retains GOP strategist Karl RoveKarl Christian RoveMore conservatives break with Trump over election claims The Hill's 12:30 Report - Presented by Capital One - Pfizer, BioNTech apply for vaccine authorization Trump, attorneys step up efforts to reverse election's outcome MORE as a lobbyist, responded the day before, a spokesperson told The Hill.

ADVERTISEMENT

Senior administration officials are reportedly alarmed at Meadow's efforts to get the Department of Defense to fast-track the process toward a request for proposal (RFP) on nationalized 5G.

A Pentagon spokesperson said there is no decision yet on an RFP.

“We hope the RFI provides great insight into the art of the possible. Once the RFI submissions are collected we will analyze the concepts and evaluate the potential solutions for feasibility. At this time it is too early to tell if an RFP will follow anytime in the future,” Russell Goemaere told The Hill.

Sources said the wireless industry has been requesting a meeting with Meadows for weeks to discuss 5G and the controversy over the Pentagon RFI. There is suspicion in the industry that an RFP could be released within a matter of days or weeks.

With Election Day approaching, a source familiar said that those who support a nationalized 5G network are also prepared to engage with Democrats to find backing.

When asked about funding for this project, Goemaere said that it would be through the normal budget process but that "DOD has no plans to own and operate a nationwide 5G network."
 
"However, as the RFI asked, DOD is exploring the idea of owning and operating a 5G network on military bases," he said.

Lawmakers, meanwhile, are unsettled by the Pentagon’s recent engagement with the wireless telecommunications industry and generally worried the administration would work to nationalize 5G and lease the federal spectrum for commercial purposes.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rep. Doris MatsuiDoris Okada MatsuiHillicon Valley: Zuckerberg and Dorsey return for another hearing | House passes 5G funding bill | Twitter introduces 'fleets' House approves legislation providing 0 million to boost US 5G efforts Overnight Health Care: States reimpose extensive COVID-19 restrictions MORE (D-Calif.), a member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, called the Pentagon’s RFI on the creation of a government-owned-and-operated 5G network a “very bad idea that raises serious legal concerns” in a statement last week.

“It is crucial that this RFI not cause costly delays we can ill afford in bringing this valuable spectrum to market,” she said in a statement.

Two leading Democrats also launched an inquiry earlier this month into Defense Department’s potential steps toward a national 5G network, seeking details about the RFI.

In letters to the administration, Rep. Frank Pallone Jr. (D-N.J.), the chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee, and Rep. Mike DoyleMichael (Mike) F. DoyleBiden's gain is Democratic baseball's loss with Cedric Richmond White House getting pushback on possible government-owned 5G network Hillicon Valley: DOJ accuses Russian hackers of targeting 2018 Olympics, French elections | Federal commission issues recommendations for securing critical tech against Chinese threats | House Democrats slam FCC over 'blatant attempt to help' Trump MORE (Pa.), the top Democrat on the panel's Communications and Technology Subcommittee, called out Rivada by name and said they have also heard reports that the White House informed the Pentagon to “proceed immediately” to an RFP.

And Republicans have concerns, too. On Oct. 1, a group of 19 GOP senators wrote to Trump expressing concerns about the RFI, saying they feel it contradicts a free-market strategy.

“Nationalizing 5G and experimenting with untested models for 5G deployment is not the way the United States will win the 5G race," read the letter, which was led by Sen. John ThuneJohn Randolph ThuneDemocrats brush off calls for Biden to play hardball on Cabinet picks Overnight Defense: Pentagon set for tighter virus restrictions as top officials tests positive | Military sees 11th COVID-19 death | House Democrats back Senate language on Confederate base names Trump keeps tight grip on GOP amid divisions MORE (R-S.D.).

It did not mention Rivada, Rove or the other political operatives with close ties to Trump.

Rivada has denied it is pursuing an RFP that would favor it moving forward.

A spokesperson for Rivada said the company opposes nationalizing anything, including 5G networks, and does not support building a government-owned or government-operated 5G network.

“The superior alternative is a network built to commercial scale and with private capital, while being shared with commercial users who are subject to pre-emption by DOD,” Rivada said in its RFI, according to an excerpt released by the company.

Rivada is financially backed by Trump ally Peter Thiel, but the company says Thiel's investment vehicle is a very small passive shareholder and he has no day-to-day involvement.

Former Speaker Newt GingrichNewton (Newt) Leroy GingrichMORE (R-Ga.) has also reportedly played a role with the company’s efforts towards nationalizing 5G, although he has said in the past he has no financial stake in it. 

ADVERTISEMENT

CTIA, which represents the wireless communications industry, the Internet and Television Association, USTelecom—The Broadband Association and other industry associations, wrote to Trump on Oct. 9, urging him to oppose any effort to nationalize a 5G network.

“Such an action would be at odds with more than a century of private sector led innovation and investment in communications networks, have a chilling effect on the entire broadband sector, and jeopardize American leadership in the global digital economy,” they wrote.

The traditionally Republican-leaning U.S. Chamber of Commerce submitted comments to the Pentagon in response to their RFI on Oct. 19, calling for the administration to refrain from developing a network that competes against the private sector.

“Nationalizing the 5G the network is something that happens in countries like Russia, and it is a disaster. All evidence from the past thirty years shows that the private sector, not government, is best positioned to develop the next generation wireless network. For the sake of American innovation and the economy, we urge the Defense Department to drop this idea,” Jordan Crenshaw, executive director of the Chamber’s Technology Engagement Center, said in a statement.

Conservative groups including Americans for Tax Reform and Heritage Action for America thanked Thune in a letter earlier this month for opposing a nationalized 5G. The groups said they are also concerned with the Defense Department’s RFI and “how quickly it is proceeding.”

“Taxpayers should not foot the bill for something that the private sector is already committed to doing through a free market approach,” they wrote.