House lawmakers fired up for hearing with tech CEOs

House lawmakers fired up for hearing with tech CEOs
© Greg Nash/Getty Images

The CEOs of the country’s biggest social media platforms will testify Thursday before a Congress eager to press them on their roles spreading misinformation related to coronavirus and the leadup to the deadly insurrection at the Capitol in January.

Facebook’s Mark ZuckerbergMark Elliot ZuckerbergHillicon Valley — Facebook 'too late' curbing climate falsities Facebook draws lawmaker scrutiny over Instagram's impact on teens How social media fuels U.S. political polarization — what to do about it MORE, Twitter’s Jack Dorsey and Google’s Sundar Pichai will appear remotely in front of two House Energy and Commerce subcommittees set to take a markedly different tone from previous hearings.

“We are done with conversation,” Rep. Jan SchakowskyJanice (Jan) Danoff SchakowskyAmerican workers need us to get this pandemic under control around the world Democrats repeal prohibition on funding abortions abroad Nearly 140 Democrats urge EPA to 'promptly' allow California to set its own vehicle pollution standards MORE (D-Ill.), chairwoman of the Consumer Protection and Commerce Subcommittee, said at an event Monday. “We are now moving ahead with regulation and legislation, and that is inevitable. We want them to understand how seriously they better take this.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The hearing will likely focus on the part the massive platforms play in spreading potentially dangerous misinformation — ranging from election result conspiracies to lies about the coronavirus vaccine — and a suite of proposed and forthcoming legislative fixes to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which gives platforms liability protection from content posted by third parties and allows them to safely moderate.

All three companies have highlighted their work on content moderation and new policies recently, hinting at how they will approach the hearing.

Facebook published a blog by Guy Rosen, its vice president of integrity, on Monday that outlined efforts to take down fake accounts, fact-check content and remove coronavirus misinformation across its platforms.

YouTube earlier this month revealed that it took down 30,000 videos with COVID-19 vaccine misinformation.

Twitter rolled out a policy for labeling vaccine misinformation posts and implemented a strike system for broader coronavirus misinformation that could see accounts suspended or removed for repeated violations.

The storming of the Capitol on Jan. 6 that left five people dead will undoubtedly be a focus of questioning, at least by Democrats.

ADVERTISEMENT

Social media was rife with both planning of the event and the falsehood — that former President TrumpDonald TrumpCapitol fencing starts coming down after 'Justice for J6' rally Netanyahu suggests Biden fell asleep in meeting with Israeli PM Aides try to keep Biden away from unscripted events or long interviews, book claims MORE was robbed of a second term — that seemingly motivated many of the participants.

House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Frank Pallone Jr. (N.J.) sent a letter along with the 22 other Democrats on the panel to Zuckerberg earlier this month raising concerns about Facebook’s role in boosting dangerous information ahead of the January attack.

Pallone, Schakowsky and Rep. Mike DoyleMichael (Mike) F. DoyleNY Democrat tests positive for COVID-19 in latest House breakthrough case Florida Democrat becomes latest breakthrough COVID-19 case in House House committee approves slate of bills to improve telecom security MORE (D-Pa.), the chairman of the Communications and Technology Subcommittee, sent a letter to Pichai around the same time pressing the CEO about YouTube allegedly promoting extremist content.

Democrats on the committee have also sent letters to Facebook, Google and Twitter about efforts to contain coronavirus misinformation.

The top Republican on the committee, Rep. Cathy McMorris RodgersCathy McMorris RodgersBiden administration rolls out clean car goals Biden, Pelosi struggle with end of eviction ban Latina lawmakers discuss efforts to increase representation MORE (Wash.), has led letters to all three platforms this month asking if they coordinated content removal decisions and for greater clarity on how they handle political content.

The hearing also comes the same week the nonprofit group Avaaz identified 267 pages and groups on Facebook, with a total of 32 million followers, that shared content glorifying violence. Facebook spokesperson Andy Stone told The Hill that only 18 of the pages and groups violated company policies. Those have since been taken down.

But Avaaz’s campaigns director, Fadi Quran, told The Hill that Facebook was “very slow” in taking action.

“We’ve done more than any other internet company to combat harmful content, having already banned nearly 900 militarized social movements and removed tens of thousands of QAnon pages, groups and accounts from our apps,” Stone said.

Despite Facebook’s and the other platforms’ efforts to tackle these issues, lawmakers remain skeptical.

Lawmakers are also likely to spend some time in the hearing brandishing their legislative proposals to amend Section 230, a bipartisan concern, although the parties are split on how to approach reform.

Schakowsky is set to unveil later this week the Online Consumer Protection Act, which would allow the Federal Trade Commission and consumers to sue platforms that violate their terms of service.

“Our members are very enthusiastic right now and anxious to go,” she said Monday.

Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee Chairwoman Anna EshooAnna Georges EshooTime for Congress to make a down payment to prevent future pandemic tragedies Hillicon Valley: US has made progress on cyber but more needed, report says | Democrat urges changes for 'problematic' crypto language in infrastructure bill | Facebook may be forced to unwind Giphy acquisition Eshoo urges Pelosi to amend infrastructure bill's 'problematic' crypto regulation language MORE (D-Calif.) and Rep. Tom MalinowskiThomas (Tom) MalinowskiThe Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - Biden to reboot COVID-19 plan House Ethics panel reviewing Rep. Malinowski's stock trades Overnight Health Care — US hits new vaccine milestone MORE (D-N.J.) are also set to reintroduce a proposal later this week that would strip Section 230 protections when platforms’ algorithms promote harmful or extremist content.

Rep. David CicillineDavid CicillineHillicon Valley —Apple is not a monopoly, judge rules Judge rules Apple is not 'illegal monopolist' in high-profile Epic case Democrats' Jan. 6 subpoena-palooza sets dangerous precedent MORE (D-R.I.), who has captained the Democrats’ approach to antitrust in the context of Big Tech, is readying a bill on the issue that also focuses on algorithmic amplification, a spokesperson confirmed to The Hill.

Proposals from Democrats in the Senate will also likely come up.

The Safe Tech Act, proposed by Sens. Mark WarnerMark Robert WarnerAdvocates call on top Democrats for 0B in housing investments Democrats draw red lines in spending fight Manchin puts foot down on key climate provision in spending bill MORE (D-Va.), Amy KlobucharAmy KlobucharKlobuchar: 'It is evil to make it deliberately hard for people to vote' Democrats push to shield election workers from violent threats   Harris, CBC put weight behind activist-led National Black Voter Day MORE (D-Minn.) and Mazie HironoMazie Keiko HironoSenate Democrats to Garland: 'It's time to end the federal death penalty' Democrats warn shrinking Biden's spending plan could backfire Hillicon Valley: Facebook tightens teen protections | FBI cautions against banning ransomware payments | Republicans probe White House-social media collaboration MORE (D-Hawaii), gained some momentum as a potential light-touch reform to the controversial law.

“Section 230 was well intentioned at its outset as a tool for this emerging industry of content providers and online platforms who wanted to do a little bit of self-moderation,” Warner said on a panel hosted by Protocol on Monday. “We’ve seen that evolve into an almost blanket immunity or ‘get-out-of-jail-free’ card for large online providers who want to do nothing about foreseeable, obvious and repeated misuse of their platforms.”