Hillicon Valley: Instagram cracks down on anti-vaccine tags | Facebook co-founder on fallout from call to break up company | House Dems reintroduce election security bill | Lawmakers offer bill requiring cyber, IT training for House

Hillicon Valley: Instagram cracks down on anti-vaccine tags | Facebook co-founder on fallout from call to break up company | House Dems reintroduce election security bill | Lawmakers offer bill requiring cyber, IT training for House

Welcome to Hillicon Valley, The Hill's newsletter detailing all you need to know about the tech and cyber news from Capitol Hill to Silicon Valley. If you don't already, be sure to sign up for our newsletter with this LINK.

Welcome! Follow the cyber team, Olivia Beavers (@olivia_beavers) and Maggie Miller (@magmill95), and the tech team, Harper Neidig (@hneidig) and Emily Birnbaum (@birnbaum_e).

 

INSTAGRAM GOES AFTER ANTIVAXXERS: Instagram this week blocked the hashtag #VaccinesKill amid its crackdown on vaccine-related misinformation, and it says it is looking into other hashtags typically used to promote false information about vaccines.

The Facebook-owned social media network had previously declined to block the #VaccinesKill hashtag, a popular gathering place for anti-vaccine activists on Instagram, arguing that the phrase "vaccines kill" did not count as medical misinformation. An Instagram spokesperson in an email to The Hill last month claimed there have been rare instances in which vaccine side effects have caused death.

ADVERTISEMENT

But under pressure this week following a CNN Business report on the medical misinformation amplified under #VaccinesKill, Instagram blocked the hashtag and said it is expanding its crackdown on medical misinformation to include hashtags that are often used to promote debunked anti-vaccine sentiments.

Instagram, under enormous scrutiny from lawmakers and public health experts, has been engaged in an ongoing effort to remove a scourge of anti-vaccine misinformation that has spread across its platform.

The platform began taking action amid the largest measles outbreak the U.S. has seen since it eradicated the disease 19 years ago, a health crisis caused in part by the rise of the so-called anti-vax movement of people who refuse to vaccine themselves or their children due to untrue conspiracy theories about the side effects of vaccines.

Phase one of the crackdown involved removing hashtags promoting overt medical misinformation about vaccines -- such as #VaccinesCauseAutism or #VaccinesCauseAIDs, both of which have been debunked by leading public health organizations.

Read more here.

 

BREAKING UP OVER FACEBOOK: Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes said Friday that his friendship with CEO Mark ZuckerbergMark Elliot ZuckerbergWarren warns Facebook may help reelect Trump 'and profit off of it' Martin Luther King Jr.'s daughter knocks Zuckerberg for invoking her father while defending Facebook Hillicon Valley: Zuckerberg defends handling of misinformation in political ads | Biden camp hits Zuckerberg over remarks | Dem bill would jail tech execs for lying about privacy | Consumer safety agency accidentally disclosed personal data MORE is "probably" over after he called for the social media giant to break up.

"Mark is a good kind person ... and I also think he has too much power," Hughes said in an interview with "CBS This Morning."

Hughes, who lived with Zuckerberg while the two were students at Harvard, said he doesn't know if the two's friendship will last.

"I really don't know if we're gonna be friends," Hughes told CBS. "Probably not, but there are some friendships where you have disagreements, and big ones, and you still stay friends."

Hughes's comments Friday came a day after he published a lengthy op-ed in The New York Times in which he called for the company to break up.

Hughes, who left Facebook in 2007, wrote that he feels a "sense of anger and responsibility" for the company's wrongs.

"We are a nation with a tradition of reining in monopolies, no matter how well intentioned the leaders of these companies may be. Mark's power is unprecedented and un-American," he wrote.

Hughes pointed to Zuckerberg's "staggering" influence at the company, which controls three major platforms -- Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp -- and noted that Zuckerberg controls about 60 percent of voting shares for Facebook's board, giving him immense control over algorithms, privacy settings and "even which messages get delivered."

Read more here.

 

ELECTION PROTECTION: House Democratic chairmen on Friday reintroduced a bill to protect U.S. election systems against cyberattacks, including requiring President TrumpDonald John TrumpDemocratic senator rips Trump's 'let them fight' remarks: 'Enough is enough' Warren warns Facebook may help reelect Trump 'and profit off of it' Trump touts Turkey cease-fire: 'Sometimes you have to let them fight' MORE to produce a "national strategy for protecting democratic institutions."

The Election Security Act is aimed at reducing risks posed by cyberattacks by foreign entities or other actors against U.S. election systems. The national strategy from President Trump would "protect against cyber attacks, influence operations, disinformation campaigns, and other activities that could undermine the security and integrity of United States democratic institutions."

The bill is sponsored by House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Bennie ThompsonBennie Gordon ThompsonHillicon Valley: Democrats seize on whistleblower complaint to push for election security | Google taps GOP Senate aide to lead lobbying | Warren calls for congressional tech office Democrats seize on whistleblower report to push for election security House Homeland Security chairman: 'This is election interference' MORE (D-Miss.), House Administration Committee Chairwoman Zoe LofgrenZoe Ellen LofgrenHillicon Valley: Zuckerberg defends handling of misinformation in political ads | Biden camp hits Zuckerberg over remarks | Dem bill would jail tech execs for lying about privacy | Consumer safety agency accidentally disclosed personal data House panel pushes forward election security legislation Democratic lobbyists bristle at party's attack on K Street MORE (D-Calif.) and Rep. John SarbanesJohn Peter Spyros SarbanesHouse to vote this month on legislation to combat foreign interference in elections Hillicon Valley: Zuckerberg to testify on Libra | Extremists find home on Telegram app | Warren blasts Facebook for not removing anti-Biden ad | California outlaws facial recognition in police body cameras | China rips US tech sanctions House Democrats introduce new legislation to combat foreign election interference MORE (D-Md.), the chairman of the Democracy Reform Task Force.

The bill would also require the establishment of cybersecurity standards for voting system vendors and require states to use paper ballots during elections. Further, the legislation would establish a National Commission to Protect U.S. Democratic Institutions that would be tasked with countering efforts to undermine democratic institutions, and require the Director of National Intelligence to assess threats to election systems 180 days prior to an election.

Read more here.

 

LEARN THE CYBER: Lawmakers on Friday introduced a resolution to require members and employees of the House of Representatives to undergo annual cybersecurity and information technology training.

The Congressional Cybersecurity Training Resolution, sponsored by Reps. Kathleen RiceKathleen Maura RiceMarijuana industry donations to lawmakers surge in 2019: analysis Pelosi backers feel vindicated after tumultuous stretch Democrat offers measure to prevent lawmakers from sleeping in their offices MORE (D-N.Y.) and John KatkoJohn Michael KatkoHacker conference report details persistent vulnerabilities to US voting systems Hillicon Valley: Senate passes bill to boost cyber help for agencies, businesses | Watchdog warns Energy Department failing to protect grid | FTC sues Match for allegedly conning users Senate approves bill to boost cyber assistance for federal agencies, private sector MORE (R-N.Y.), would require the chief administrative officer of the House to carry out annual cyber and IT training for House members, officers and employees. While House employees are already required to undergo this training, Rice in a statement said that "it's past time" House members be "held to the same standard."

"Cyberattacks continue to pose a growing and vexing threat at nearly every level of government and Congressional Offices are no exception," Rice said. "If we want to effectively counter those threats, then we need to make sure Members of Congress are equipped with the tools and knowledge to play an active role in this fight."

Katko, who is the ranking member of the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection and Innovation, said it is "imperative" for members of Congress to be able to identify potential cyber intrusions.

Read more here.

 

TRIAL OF THE CENTURY: Tesla CEO Elon MuskElon Reeve MuskHillicon Valley: Google, Reddit to testify on tech industry protections | Trump joins Amazon-owned Twitch | House to vote on bill to combat foreign interference NASA targeting early 2020 for first manned SpaceX mission Hillicon Valley: Senate Intel report urges action to prevent 2020 Russian meddling | Republicans warn Microsoft of 'urgent' Huawei threat | Court rules FBI surveillance violated Americans' rights MORE will go to trial over a defamation claim from a British diver who was involved in the rescue of a soccer team from a flooded cave in Thailand, a judge ruled Friday.

In court filings Friday first reported by The Verge, U.S. District Judge Stephen Wilson wrote that "[a] reasonable fact-finder could easily conclude that [Musk's] statements ... implied assertions of objective fact," referring to Musk's now-deleted tweets and emails to BuzzFeed News that claimed the plaintiff, Vernon Unsworth, was a pedophile.

Musk referred to Unsworth, who was involved in the rescue of several young boys trapped in a flooded cave last year, as a "pedo guy" on his Twitter account, which is followed by millions of users, and later doubled down, writing: "bet ya a signed dollar it's true."

In an email to a BuzzFeed News reporter, Musk implied that Unsworth had moved to Thailand in the hopes of finding a child bride while viciously attacking the reporter for "defending" Unsworth.

"I suggest that you call people you know in Thailand, find out what's actually going on and stop defending child rapists, you f**king asshole," Musk wrote, according to BuzzFeed. "He's an old, single white guy from England who's been traveling to or living in Thailand for 30 to 40 years, mostly Pattaya Beach, until moving to Chiang Rai for a child bride who was about 12 years old at the time."

Read more here.

 

AN OP-ED TO CHEW ON: What GDPR's first year says about data privacy regulation.

 

A LIGHTER CLICK: Public service journalism.

 

NOTABLE LINKS FROM AROUND THE WEB:

Netflix issues first top ten list in the UK with 'Our Planet' and 'The Perfect Date' on top. (Variety)

China erodes U.S. dominance in tech with an avalanche of patents. (Bloomberg)

Uber goes public: everything you need to know about the biggest tech IPO in years. (The Verge)

Global regulators race to curb Silicon Valley. (The Wall Street Journal)