Hillicon Valley — Presented by Facebook — Federal court rules tech giants can censor content | Trump upends surveillance fight | Senate passes bill barring federal funds for Huawei equipment

Hillicon Valley — Presented by Facebook — Federal court rules tech giants can censor content | Trump upends surveillance fight | Senate passes bill barring federal funds for Huawei equipment
© Getty Images

Welcome to Hillicon Valley, The Hill's newsletter detailing all you need to know about the tech and cyber news from Capitol Hill to Silicon Valley. If you don't already, be sure to sign up for our newsletter with this LINK.

Welcome! Follow the cyber team, Maggie Miller (@magmill95), and the tech team, Emily Birnbaum (@birnbaum_e) and Chris Mills Rodrigo (@chrisismills).

 

ADVERTISEMENT

BRING IN THE CENSORS: A federal appeals court on Wednesday ruled that internet giants like Google and Facebook can censor content on their platforms, rebuking arguments from conservatives who claim the tech companies violate users' First Amendment rights by removing certain messages or videos. 

With its unanimous opinion, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals became the latest court to dismiss arguments that platforms like YouTube can be sued under the First Amendment for decisions on content moderation.

"Despite YouTube's ubiquity and its role as a public-facing platform, it remains a private forum, not a public forum subject to judicial scrutiny under the First Amendment," Circuit Judge M. Margaret McKeown, a Clinton appointee, wrote in the opinion.

The three-judge panel upheld a lower court's decision to dismiss the case. 

Dennis Prager, founder of the conservative advocacy organization Prager University, first sued Google in 2017 over claims that its subsidiary YouTube was prioritizing left-leaning content over Prager U's popular conservative videos. 

Prager U lost the case when U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh, an Obama appointee, declared that YouTube is a private company and therefore can't be treated similarly to state actors.

Prager argued that YouTube, which has 2 billion users worldwide, functions as a "public square" because of its ubiquity. 

ADVERTISEMENT

But on Wednesday, McKeown wrote, "YouTube does not perform a public function by inviting public discourse on its property. To characterize YouTube as a public forum would be a paradigm shift."

Google has continued to insist that its products are not politically biased and that Prager's claims were "meritless." 

Read more on the ruling here.

 

SPONSORED CONTENT — FACEBOOK

Elections have changed and so has Facebook

Facebook has made large investments to protect elections, including tripling the size of the teams working on safety and security to more than 35,000. But the work doesn’t stop there.

See how Facebook has prepared for 2020.

 

CURVEBALL: Sen. Rand PaulRandal (Rand) Howard PaulGeorgia governor says he didn't know asymptomatic people could spread coronavirus McConnell: Impeachment distracted government from coronavirus threat Warren knocks McConnell for forcing in-person Senate vote amid coronavirus pandemic MORE (R-Ky.) said Thursday that President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump fires intelligence community inspector general who flagged Ukraine whistleblower complaint Trump organization has laid off over 1000 employees due to pandemic: report Trump invokes Defense Production Act to prevent export of surgical masks, gloves MORE backs his proposal to include reforms to the surveillance court as part of a bill reauthorizing expiring intelligence programs, complicating the path forward for the legislation. 

"The [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act] FISA reforms that I think are very necessary is that FISA warrants shouldn't be issued on Americans and any information gathered by the FISA court shouldn't be used against Americans. It's for foreign intelligence. This is a big reform. ... I think it will get bipartisan support. I've talked to the president about it," Paul said. 

Paul said he would insist on a vote to get the reforms to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court he is pushing for included in any bill to reauthorize three expiring provisions of the USA Freedom Act. 

"He's supportive of my amendment," Paul added, when asked about his conversation with the president. 

Trump's decision to back including reforms to the surveillance court in the intelligence bill puts him at odds with Senate GOP leadership and Attorney General William BarrWilliam Pelham BarrFeds distributing masks, other gear seized in price-gouging investigation to NY, NJ health care workers The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - All eyes on today's unemployment numbers Trump announces enhanced counternarcotics operation at coronavirus briefing MORE, who told Republican senators in a closed-door lunch on Tuesday that the president would back a clean extension.

Read more here.

The Hill's Jordain Carney has more here on how Trump is upending the surveillance fight.

 

POST-IMPEACHMENT HAZE: Just one month after arguing on a united front for President Trump's removal from office, three former House impeachment managers team are locked in a fierce battle over a controversial government surveillance bill.

Rep. Zoe LofgrenZoe Ellen LofgrenHillicon Valley: FCC chief proposes 0M telehealth program | Twitter takes down posts promoting anti-malaria drugs for coronavirus| Whole Foods workers plan Tuesday strike Trump says election proposals in coronavirus stimulus bill would hurt Republican chances Democratic lawmakers demand government stop deporting unaccompanied children MORE (D-Calif.), a senior member on the House Judiciary Committee, threw plans to reauthorize some intelligence provisions in the USA Freedom Act into a tailspin Wednesday after she threatened to hold votes on several surveillance-related amendments.

The move not only forced Chairman Jerrold NadlerJerrold (Jerry) Lewis NadlerHouse Judiciary Committee postpones hearing with Barr amid coronavirus outbreak House Democrats plead with key committee chairman to allow remote voting amid coronavirus pandemic Pelosi rejects calls to shutter Capitol: 'We are the captains of this ship' MORE (D-N.Y.) to postpone consideration of the broader legislation, which he negotiated for months with House Intelligence Chairman Adam SchiffAdam Bennett SchiffTrump fires intelligence community inspector general who flagged Ukraine whistleblower complaint Hannity blasts criticism of Fox News: 'I have taken this seriously' Pelosi forms House committee to oversee coronavirus response MORE (D-Calif.) and Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiTrump says he opposes mail-in voting for November On The Money: Economy sheds 701K jobs in March | Why unemployment checks could take weeks | Confusion surrounds 9B in small-business loans The bipartisan neutering of the Congressional Budget Office MORE (D-Calif.), it also pitted the two chairmen against a former teammate from the weeks-long Democratic effort to carefully lay out a case against Trump during the Senate impeachment trial.

ADVERTISEMENT

The back and forth comes amid a debate over whether to pass a reauthorization bill that could glide through the Senate or one heavy with reforms that might fail to garner enough support for passage in the upper chamber.

A group of House Democrats and Republicans want to fold in amendments to reform the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court following a government watchdog's assessment last year that found 17 "significant errors and omissions" by law enforcement officials in their efforts to obtain a wiretap on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

Lofgren, who dismissed the notion that there was a personal rift between her and the two Democratic chairmen, is pushing to introduce legislation that would create more oversight over the FISA court and significantly curtail the amount of sensitive information the government is allowed to collect on Americans. She felt Nadler and Schiff's bill did not go far enough to achieve that.

"This is about policy," Lofgren told The Hill in a phone interview, noting that she attended a reception for impeachment managers with both Nadler and Schiff on Wednesday night, just hours after the showdown over the surveillance provisions.

"I'm pursuing a policy that I think is consistent with the Constitution and serves the American people," she continued, adding that doing so "is not new for me."

Lofgren's FISA amendments upset the chairmen's hopes of moving forward a clean bill. The future of the controversial government surveillance provisions is now in limbo with a mid-March deadline approaching.

And despite the claims of amicable relations, some Judiciary sources described a lingering rivalry between the two, citing this tug of war over surveillance policy as the latest example.

ADVERTISEMENT

Asked about progress in the FISA negotiations, Pelosi acknowledged the delay over key sticking points but also expressed hope that a compromise is possible before the programs expire on March 15.

"I was there for some of the FISA revisions in the past," Pelosi said Thursday at her weekly press conference. "The goal is to have the right balance between civil liberties and national security. I think the bill that was put together in the Judiciary Committee, working with the Intelligence Committee, does that. There are others who would like to see some other provisions, we're just working through that now, with respect for everyone's point of view."

Read more on the fight in the House here.

 

SPONSORED CONTENT — FACEBOOK

Elections have changed and so has Facebook

Facebook has made large investments to protect elections, including tripling the size of the teams working on safety and security to more than 35,000. But the work doesn’t stop there.

See how Facebook has prepared for 2020.

 

BAD NEWS FOR HUAWEI: The Senate unanimously approved legislation on Thursday that would ban the use of federal funds to purchase telecommunications equipment from companies deemed a national security threat, such as Chinese group Huawei. 

The bipartisan Secure and Trusted Telecommunications Networks Act, which the House passed in December, bans the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from giving funds to U.S. telecom groups to purchase equipment from companies deemed threats. 

The bill would require the FCC to establish a $1 billion fund to help smaller telecom providers to rip out and replace equipment from such companies, and to compile a list of firms seen as posing a threat to telecom networks. 

The bill is primarily sponsored by House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Frank Pallone (D-N.J.), ranking member Greg WaldenGregory (Greg) Paul WaldenOvernight Energy: Trump rolls back Obama-era fuel efficiency standards | Controversial Keystone XL construction to proceed | Pressure mounts to close national parks amid pandemic Infrastructure bill gains new steam as coronavirus worsens Critics blast Trump mileage rollback, citing environment and health concerns MORE (R-Ore.), and Reps. Doris MatsuiDoris Okada MatsuiOvernight Energy: Critics blast EPA move as 'license to pollute' during pandemic | Trump expected to roll back Obama mileage standards| Group plans to sue over rollback of water law Trump administration expected to roll back Obama-era mileage standards Hillicon Valley: Facebook, Twitter dismantle Russian interference campaign targeting African Americans | YouTube to allow ads on coronavirus videos | Trump signs law banning federal funds for Huawei equipment MORE (D-Calif.) and Brett GuthrieSteven (Brett) Brett GuthrieHillicon Valley: Facebook, Twitter dismantle Russian interference campaign targeting African Americans | YouTube to allow ads on coronavirus videos | Trump signs law banning federal funds for Huawei equipment Trump signs law banning use of federal funds to purchase Huawei equipment Hillicon Valley — Presented by Facebook — Federal court rules tech giants can censor content | Trump upends surveillance fight | Senate passes bill barring federal funds for Huawei equipment MORE (R-Ky.). 

Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Roger WickerRoger Frederick WickerBottom Line Stimulus empowers Treasury to rescue airlines with billion in direct assistance White House, Senate reach deal on trillion stimulus package MORE (R-Miss.), whose panel has jurisdiction over the bill, praised its passage. 

"Telecommunications equipment from certain foreign adversaries poses a significant threat to our national security, economic prosperity, and the future of U.S. leadership in advanced wireless technology," Wicker said in a statement. "By establishing a 'rip and replace' program, this legislation will provide meaningful safeguards for our communications networks and more secure connections for Americans."

The legislation, if signed into law by President Trump, would have a major impact on rural telecom providers. The Rural Wireless Association estimated in a 2018 filing to the FCC that around 25 percent of its member companies use equipment from either Huawei or Chinese group ZTE.  

Read more here.

 

DEMS PRESS FACEBOOK ON GUN SALES: A group of Democratic senators sent a letter Thursday pressing Facebook over private gun sales on the platform.

"[D]espite Facebook's ban of gun sales on its platforms, users are nonetheless able to facilitate firearm transactions in private Facebook groups specifically designed to skirt Facebook's ban on firearm sales," the 13 senators wrote in the letter to Facebook CEO Mark ZuckerbergMark Elliot ZuckerbergHillicon Valley: Trump, telecom executives talk coronavirus response | Pelosi pushes funding for mail-in voting | New York AG wants probe into firing of Amazon worker | Marriott hit by another massive breach As misinformation surges, coronavirus poses AI challenge Zuckerberg, Gates team up to contribute M for research into coronavirus treatments MORE.

Facebook first banned the sale of firearms on the platform in 2016, then in 2018 it added proactive measures to identify sellers after pressure from lawmakers.

"We have concerns that those measures fall short," the lawmakers led by Sens. Bob MenendezRobert (Bob) MenendezHillicon Valley: Facebook launches portal for coronavirus information | EU sees spike in Russian misinformation on outbreak | Senate Dem bill would encourage mail-in voting | Lawmakers question safety of Google virus website Democratic senators press Google over privacy of coronavirus screening site Menendez calls for 'Marie Yovanovitch bill' to protect foreign service employees MORE (D-N.J.) and Ed MarkeyEdward (Ed) John MarkeyOvernight Health Care: CDC recommends face coverings in public | Resistance to social distancing sparks new worries | Controversy over change of national stockpile definition | McConnell signals fourth coronavirus bill Democratic senators want probe into change of national stockpile description Overnight Energy: Oil giants meet with Trump at White House | Interior extends tenure of controversial land management chief | Oil prices tick up on hopes of Russia-Saudi deal MORE (D-Mass.) wrote in the letter to Facebook.

The senators are demanding answers to a series of questions -- including how many private groups Facebook has banned for violating the firearm sale policy and how the company coordinates with law enforcement -- by March 12.

Read more here.

 

CORONAVIRUS CONCERNS: Facebook on Thursday announced it is cancelling its annual developer conference because of the spread of the coronavirus.

"This was a tough call to make -- F8 is an incredibly important event for Facebook and it's one of our favorite ways to celebrate all of you from around the world -- but we need to prioritize the health and safety of our developer partners, employees and everyone who helps put F8 on," Konstantinos Papamiltiadis, director of platform partnerships at Facebook, wrote in a blog post announcing the cancellation.

"We explored other ways to keep the in-person part of F8, but it's important to us to host an inclusive event and it didn't feel right to have F8 without our international developers in attendance."

The annual conference was scheduled for May 5 and 6 in San Jose, Calif.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention confirmed Wednesday the first U.S. coronavirus case of unknown origin in Northern California. On Thursday, California Gov. Gavin NewsomGavin Christopher NewsomSocial distancing works, but resistance prompts worries of growing crisis Newsom announces partnership with FEMA to find shelter for most vulnerable homeless populations California governor responds to Nunes on canceling school: 'We'll continue to listen to the experts' MORE (D) said the state was monitoring over 8,400 people for the virus.

Read more here.

 

THAT'S A NO: More than 150 faculty members and academics have signed on to a campaign opposing the use of facial recognition technology on college campuses. 

Their letter, published online Thursday, urges institutions of higher learning to ban the technology, which scans faces for the purpose of identifying individuals, citing bias and civil rights concerns.

"We believe it is our duty to protect our campuses as learning environments where our students, fellow staff, and community members are safe, and that the constant surveillance of facial recognition threatens our human rights and privacy," wrote the current and former educators from schools including Harvard, Yale and Stanford.

"Students should not have to trade their right to safety and privacy for an education."

The letter from educators is part of a wider campaign led by Fight for the Future and college group Students for Sensible Drug Policy to block the controversial tech from colleges.

Read more here.

 

THE RUSSIANS ARE COMING: An online "impersonator" pretending to be a Democratic National Committee (DNC) staffer tried to contact presidential campaigns, including Sen. Bernie SandersBernie SandersOvernight Energy: Oil giants meet with Trump at White House | Interior extends tenure of controversial land management chief | Oil prices tick up on hopes of Russia-Saudi deal Oil giants meet at White House amid talk of buying strategic reserves The Hill's Campaign Report: Biden struggles to stay in the spotlight MORE's (I-Vt.) campaign, the committee said in a statement to the candidates Wednesday.

Bob Lord, the DNC's chief security officer, wrote in an email to the campaigns obtained by The Hill that "adversaries will often try to impersonate real people on a campaign."

He added that the "adversaries" could try to get campaign workers to "download suspicious files, or click on a link to a phishing site" or set up calls or in-person meetings to record and release.

Lord warned that the "impersonator" contacted the Sanders campaign and at least two others and had a domain registered overseas. But he acknowledged that anyone can register a domain name in any country.  

"Attribution is notoriously hard," he wrote. "The appropriate authorities have been alerted."

"If you are using an alternate domain, please refrain from doing so and let us know if you are operating from a domain that others have not corresponded with before," Lord added. "Do not use your personal mail account for official business."

Read more here.

 

A LIGHTER CLICK: Quality treatment

 

AN OP-ED TO CHEW ON: There's no election law about social media disclosures--but there oughta be 

 

NOTABLE LINKS FROM AROUND THE WEB:

Clearview's facial recognition app has been used by the Justice Department, ICE, Macy's, Walmart, and the NBA (BuzzFeed News / Ryan Mac, Caroline Haskins and Logan McDonald)

Coronavirus is the first big test for futuristic tech that can prevent pandemics (Recode / Rebecca Heilweil)

Google's black box algorithm controls which political emails land in your main inbox. For 2020 presidential candidates, the differences are stark. (The Markup / Adrianne Jeffries, Leon Yin and Surya Mattu) 

Pete ButtigiegPete ButtigiegButtigieg launches new PAC to aid down-ballot candidates HuffPost political reporter on why Bernie fell way behind Biden Economists fear slow pace of testing will prolong recession MORE is canvassing his Twitter followers ahead of Super Tuesday (The Verge / Makena Kelly)