SPONSORED:

Judge delivers second blow to Trump over financial records

A federal judge in New York on Wednesday ruled that Deutsche Bank and Capital One may provide President TrumpDonald TrumpWarren says Republican party 'eating itself and it is discovering that the meal is poisonous' More than 75 Asian, LGBTQ groups oppose anti-Asian crime bill McConnell says he's 'great admirer' of Liz Cheney but mum on her removal MORE's financial records to House Democratic lawmakers after the administration attempted to block the move.

U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos, an Obama appointee, made the ruling in a New York courthouse Wednesday afternoon after hearing arguments from both parties in the case.

The ruling is the second setback for the president this week in his fight to stop lawmakers from gaining access to his financial records as part of their sweeping probes into him, his administration, his private businesses and his family.

Trump, his businesses and family members had argued for the federal court in New York to issue a preliminary injunction to block the subpoenas for documents.

ADVERTISEMENT

Trump had sued the financial institutions to try to block them from handing over the documents in response to subpoenas issued by House Financial Services Committee Chairwoman Maxine WatersMaxine Moore WatersJuan Williams: Tim Scott should become a Democrat The Hill's Morning Report - Biden address to Congress will dominate busy week Maxine Waters: Judge in Chauvin trial who criticized her was 'angry' MORE (D-Calif.) and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam SchiffAdam Bennett SchiffDNC plans to project image calling GOP 'party of Trump' on his DC hotel after Cheney vote Democrats fundraise off of vote to remove Cheney from GOP leadership Free Speech Inc.: The Democratic Party finds a new but shaky faith in corporate free speech MORE (D-Calif.). The president's attorneys had requested a preliminary injunction in the case, claiming that there would be "irreparable harm" if the financial records were given to House Democrats.

"There will be no way to unring the bell once the Banks give Congress the requested information," the president's attorneys argued in one court filing.

Schiff, who had issued one of the subpoenas challenged in the lawsuit, called Wednesday's ruling another "resounding victory in the district court. that bodes well."

He said that a bombshell New York Times report that Deutsche Bank staff had highlighted "suspicious" activity in accounts attached to Trump and his son-in-law and White House aide Jared KushnerJared Corey KushnerNew Kushner group aims to promote relations between Arab states, Israel Republicans request documents on Kerry's security clearance process Iran moves closer to a diplomatic breakthrough that may upset Israel MORE shows "why it's so important for us to do our work without delay or interference by the president or family members."

Trump's lawyers have promised to appeal any ruling not in their favor.

Trump's lawyers also argued that the document requests were beyond the bounds of Congress's authorities, claiming that lawmakers had to have a specific legislative purpose in requesting the documents. And they alleged that Democrats in Congress were solely acting to dredge up damaging information relating to the president ahead of the 2020 election

Lawyers for House Democrats pushed back against that claim. They argued in court filings that Congress was conducting "legitimate" investigations and that Trump and his businesses "have continually engaged in stonewalling intended to obstruct and undermine these inquiries."

Wednesday's ruling is the second blow this week to the president in his legal war against House Democrats after a federal judge in D.C. ruled Monday that Trump accounting firm Mazars could hand over requested financial records to the House Oversight and Reform Committee. Trump's attorneys have appealed that ruling to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Some House Democrats have pointed to the legal victories to argue that starting an impeachment inquiry against Trump is not necessary in order to hold him accountable. And others have said it's a sign they will win in other battles with the administration, such as the push to obtain Trump's tax returns.

Still, Trump's lawyers are likely to appeal the latest ruling as well. And with major political implications at hand, judges are likely to be cautious in issuing their rulings, meaning the legal battle could drag out over the coming weeks and months.

Some legal experts have predicted that the fight could go all the way up the court system to the Supreme Court. The justices are expected to wrap up their term by the end of June.

Olivia Beavers contributed.

Updated 5:47 p.m.