Ginsburg sides with conservative justices in ruling over prison sentence

The Supreme Court on Monday found that a criminal defendant can be sentenced for violating his supervised release, even if the release expires while he is incarcerated ahead of facing new charges.

The justices, divided in the 5-4 decision, ruled against Jason Mont's argument that a district court shouldn't be able to charge him for violating his release because the term had expired at the time of the new sentencing.

ADVERTISEMENT

Justice Ruth Bader GinsburgRuth Bader GinsburgAnticipation builds for final Supreme Court rulings Anticipation builds for final Supreme Court rulings Disclosure forms offer glimpse into Supreme Court's finances MORE sided with conservative Justices Clarence ThomasClarence ThomasDisclosure forms offer glimpse into Supreme Court's finances Disclosure forms offer glimpse into Supreme Court's finances Anita Hill: I could see myself voting for Biden over Trump MORE, John Roberts, Samuel AlitoSamuel AlitoDisclosure forms offer glimpse into Supreme Court's finances Disclosure forms offer glimpse into Supreme Court's finances Ginsburg sides with conservative justices in ruling over prison sentence MORE and Brett KavanaughBrett Michael KavanaughAnticipation builds for final Supreme Court rulings Anticipation builds for final Supreme Court rulings Trump throws support behind 'no brainer' measure to ban burning of American flag MORE in the majority. Justice Neil GorsuchNeil GorsuchDisclosure forms offer glimpse into Supreme Court's finances Disclosure forms offer glimpse into Supreme Court's finances Democrats should initiate a 'Fire Mitch McConnell' campaign MORE joined liberal Justices Sonia SotomayorSonia SotomayorDisclosure forms offer glimpse into Supreme Court's finances Disclosure forms offer glimpse into Supreme Court's finances Ginsburg sides with conservative justices in ruling over prison sentence MORE, Stephen BreyerStephen BreyerDisclosure forms offer glimpse into Supreme Court's finances Disclosure forms offer glimpse into Supreme Court's finances Supreme Court declines to take up Guantanamo Bay detainee's case MORE and Elena KaganElena KaganDisclosure forms offer glimpse into Supreme Court's finances Ginsburg sides with conservative justices in ruling over prison sentence Supreme Court rules against man over arrest at Arctic Man festival MORE in opposing the decision.

Mont had previously been convicted on felony drug and gun charges and served 84 months in prison before beginning a five-year supervised release due to end in March 2017.

However, he faced other charges in 2015 and 2016 and was incarcerated in state jail in June 2016. After several delays of a hearing, a district court heard and ruled that Mont had violated his supervised release and imposed another prison sentence.

Mont had opposed the new 42-month sentence, set to run after completing the sentence for his new charges, which he pleaded guilty to. He said that he shouldn't face the new sentence because the court had repeatedly delayed the hearing until after the end date for his supervised release term.

Thomas wrote in the majority opinion that "time in pretrial detention constitutes supervised release only if the charges against the defendant are dismissed or the defendant is acquitted."

"This ensures that the defendant is not faulted for conduct he might not have committed, while otherwise giving full effect to the lawful judgment previously imposed on the defendant."

However, Sotomayor wrote in the dissenting opinion that she doesn't agree with the majority's reasoning "that a person 'is imprisoned in connection with a conviction' before any conviction has occurred."