Buttigieg defends court-packing proposal at Democratic debate

Buttigieg defends court-packing proposal at Democratic debate
© Getty Images

South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete ButtigiegPeter (Pete) Paul ButtigiegPress: Another billionaire need not apply Saagar Enjeti dismisses Warren, Klobuchar claims of sexism Warren on winning over male voters: I was told to 'smile more' MORE was the only Democratic presidential candidate on the debate stage Tuesday night to explicitly endorse court packing as way to prevent Roe v. Wade from being overturned by a conservative majority on the Supreme Court.

Buttigieg said he wasn't wedded to expanding the number of justices but believes it would be an effective approach to limiting partisan control of the high court.

"Now, one way to fix this would be to have a 15-member court where five of the members can only be appointed by unanimous agreement of the other 10," Buttigieg said.

ADVERTISEMENT
He also proposed term limits for Supreme Court justices as a potential alternative.

Other candidates who were asked about court packing were more wary of the idea.

Former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenPoll: Buttigieg leads Democratic field in Iowa Barr to launch anti-gun violence initiative during public impeachment hearing Biden will always represent the 'safety candidate,' says Democratic strategist MORE said he would rather focus on the strength of a court nominee's support for upholding abortion rights.

"I would not pack the court," Biden said. "What I would do is make sure that the people that I recommended for the court from — Ruth Bader GinsburgRuth Bader GinsburgJustices appear divided over expanding police officers' traffic stop power Loaded poll questions harm civil discourse Clintons tell Ginsburg they struggled to complete 'RBG workout' MORE to Elena KaganElena KaganOvernight Energy: EPA watchdog slams agency chief after deputy fails to cooperate in probe | Justices wrestle with reach of Clean Water Act | Bipartisan Senate climate caucus grows Justices wrestle with reach of Clean Water Act Justices appear divided over expanding police officers' traffic stop power MORE, who used to work for me, to others — that they, in fact, support the right of privacy, on which the entire notion of a woman's right to choose is based."

Former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julián Castro also pushed back on the notion of court packing, saying, "I think the plan that Mayor Pete mentioned is an interesting one, but I actually believe that if we were selecting from one of those things that the smarter move might be to look at term limits or having people cycle off from the appellate courts, so that you would have a replenishment of perspective."

Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth Ann WarrenPoll: Buttigieg leads Democratic field in Iowa Biden will always represent the 'safety candidate,' says Democratic strategist Former Clinton aide: 'Biden has had a number of issues in using somewhat gendered language' MORE (D-Mass.) largely sidestepped the question, but said that given the broad support for Roe v. Wade, Congress should codify it into law.

"We should not leave this to the Supreme Court," she said. "We should do it through democracy, because we can."