Buttigieg defends court-packing proposal at Democratic debate

Buttigieg defends court-packing proposal at Democratic debate
© Getty Images

South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete ButtigiegPete ButtigiegLGBTQ voters must show up at the polls, or risk losing progress Buttigieg says it's time to 'turn the page' on Trump administration Sunday shows preview: Coronavirus cases surge in the Midwest; Trump hits campaign trail after COVID-19 MORE was the only Democratic presidential candidate on the debate stage Tuesday night to explicitly endorse court packing as way to prevent Roe v. Wade from being overturned by a conservative majority on the Supreme Court.

Buttigieg said he wasn't wedded to expanding the number of justices but believes it would be an effective approach to limiting partisan control of the high court.

"Now, one way to fix this would be to have a 15-member court where five of the members can only be appointed by unanimous agreement of the other 10," Buttigieg said.

He also proposed term limits for Supreme Court justices as a potential alternative.

Other candidates who were asked about court packing were more wary of the idea.

Former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenFacebook, Twitter CEOs to testify before Senate Judiciary Committee on Nov. 17 Sanders hits back at Trump's attack on 'socialized medicine' Senate GOP to drop documentary series days before election hitting China, Democrats over coronavirus MORE said he would rather focus on the strength of a court nominee's support for upholding abortion rights.

"I would not pack the court," Biden said. "What I would do is make sure that the people that I recommended for the court from — Ruth Bader GinsburgRuth Bader GinsburgMcConnell tees up Barrett nomination, setting up rare weekend session Jaime Harrison raises million in two weeks for South Carolina Senate bid Dozens of legal experts throw weight behind Supreme Court term limit bill MORE to Elena KaganElena KaganSupreme Court reinstates ban on curbside voting in Alabama Key moments from Barrett's marathon question-and-answer session Barrett fight puts focus on abortion in 2020 election MORE, who used to work for me, to others — that they, in fact, support the right of privacy, on which the entire notion of a woman's right to choose is based."

Former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julián Castro also pushed back on the notion of court packing, saying, "I think the plan that Mayor Pete mentioned is an interesting one, but I actually believe that if we were selecting from one of those things that the smarter move might be to look at term limits or having people cycle off from the appellate courts, so that you would have a replenishment of perspective."

Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth WarrenFinal debate: War Admiral vs. Seabiscuit Biden defends his health plan from Trump attacks Progressives blast Biden plan to form panel on Supreme Court reform MORE (D-Mass.) largely sidestepped the question, but said that given the broad support for Roe v. Wade, Congress should codify it into law.

"We should not leave this to the Supreme Court," she said. "We should do it through democracy, because we can."