Supreme Court upholds death sentence for Arizona man

Supreme Court upholds death sentence for Arizona man
© Greg Nash

The Supreme Court in a 5-4 opinion on Tuesday upheld a death sentence for an Arizona man convicted of killing two people nearly three decades ago. 

The decision — which saw dissent from the court's four liberal justices, Ruth Bader GinsburgRuth Bader GinsburgSupreme Court to hear landmark abortion case this week Roe redux: Is 'viability' still viable as a constitutional doctrine? Yankee Doodling the media: How 'Let's Go Brandon' became a rallying cry against news bias MORE, Stephen BreyerStephen BreyerSupreme Court won't exempt Mass. hospital workers from vaccine mandate Potential Biden Supreme Court pick joins fray over Trump Jan. 6 subpoena Overnight Health Care — Feds, military top 90 percent vaccine rate MORE, Sonia SotomayorSonia SotomayorPotential Biden Supreme Court pick joins fray over Trump Jan. 6 subpoena Graham emerges as go-to ally for Biden's judicial picks Supreme Court grapples with excluding Puerto Rico from federal benefits program MORE and Elena KaganElena KaganPotential Biden Supreme Court pick joins fray over Trump Jan. 6 subpoena Graham emerges as go-to ally for Biden's judicial picks Why did courts hit pause for Trump — but not Texas abortions? MORE — denies James McKinney a new sentencing hearing following his 1992 conviction. 

Justice Brett KavanaughBrett Michael KavanaughSupreme Court to hear landmark abortion case this week Roe redux: Is 'viability' still viable as a constitutional doctrine? Graham emerges as go-to ally for Biden's judicial picks MORE, who delivered the opinion of the conservative judges, rejected McKinney’s argument that the decision over whether he should serve a life sentence or face death should be made by a jury, not a judge. 

ADVERTISEMENT

McKinney was convicted of two counts of first-degree murder after killing two people in a series of home burglaries.

Nearly 20 years after McKinney’s conviction, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit found that the Arizona courts had violated the law by failing to properly consider relevant mitigating evidence of McKinney's post traumatic stress disorder. 

His case returned to the Arizona Supreme Court and McKinney argued he is entitled to a jury sentencing, but the state Supreme Court upheld his death sentence. 

"According to McKinney, appellate courts may no longer reweigh aggravating and mitigating circumstances in determining whether to uphold a death sentence. McKinney is incorrect," Kavanaugh wrote.