Supreme Court declines challenge to DOJ execution method

The Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a challenge by several death row inmates to the Trump administration’s revised approach to federal executions.

Four inmates, most of whom are scheduled to be killed next month, argued that a lethal injection protocol that the Department of Justice adopted last year violates federal law.

Two of the court's more liberal justices, Ruth Bader GinsburgRuth Bader GinsburgSCOTUS has walked us out onto a slippery slope How Trump can get his mojo back OVERNIGHT ENERGY: WH pushed for 'correction' to Weather Service tweet contradicting Trump in 'Sharpiegate' incident, watchdog says | Supreme Court rules that large swath of Oklahoma belongs to Native American tribe MORE and Sonia SotomayorSonia SotomayorPrinceton must finish what it started OVERNIGHT ENERGY: WH pushed for 'correction' to Weather Service tweet contradicting Trump in 'Sharpiegate' incident, watchdog says | Supreme Court rules that large swath of Oklahoma belongs to Native American tribe In rueful praise of Elena Kagan: The 'Little Sisters' ruling MORE, indicated they would have taken up the case. But the court's denial of a review means fewer than four justices signed on to hear the dispute.

ADVERTISEMENT

Attorney General William BarrBill BarrGOP senator says Trump commuting Stone was a 'mistake' Barr recommended Trump not give Stone clemency: report Trump commutes Roger Stone's sentence MORE earlier this month scheduled the executions to take place in July and August.

Ruth Friedman, an attorney for Daniel Lee, one of the four inmates, slammed the court for not taking up the case.

"The federal death penalty is arbitrary, racially-biased, and rife with poor lawyering and junk science," Friedman, director of the Federal Capital Habeas Project, said in a statement. "Given the unfairness built into the federal death penalty system and the many unanswered questions about both the cases of the men scheduled to die and the government’s new execution protocol, there must be appropriate court review before the government can proceed with any execution.”

A federal execution has not been carried out since 2003, due in part to a widespread shortage during the Obama administration of lethal injection drugs in the so-called three-drug cocktail.

Barr announced last July that federal capital punishment would resume with the use of a single drug, pentobarbital sodium.

ADVERTISEMENT

At issue was whether the Trump administration’s drug protocol violates the Federal Death Penalty Act, which says that the state where a capital crime was committed should determine the method of execution.

In April, the D.C. Circuit panel ruled 2-1 in favor of a Trump administration plan to resume federal death sentences under a new lethal injection protocol, prompting the inmates’ unsuccessful petition to the Supreme Court.

Updated at 10:07 a.m.