Supreme Court sides with religious schools in discrimination suits

The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that a pair of Los Angeles-area Catholic schools are immune from discrimination suits brought by two former teachers in a decision that expands the scope of First Amendment safeguards for religious employers.

The 7-2 decision broadens the so-called ministerial exception, a First Amendment doctrine that prohibits lawsuits by employees who are considered ministers due to the religious nature of their work.

The former teachers are Agnes Morrissey-Berru, who says she suffered age discrimination, and now-deceased Kristen Biel, whose widower said Biel’s school fired her in violation of disability laws while she battled breast cancer.

Justice Samuel AlitoSamuel AlitoCanceling the Constitution: Biden hailed for violating rule of law to extend eviction moratorium 'Freedom-loving' conservatives stoked latest round of infection and death Bill would honor Ginsburg, O'Connor with statues at Capitol MORE wrote in the majority's opinion that teachers at religious schools qualify under the ministerial exception because they are tasked with instructing their institutions' faith to students.

"The religious education and formation of students is the very reason for the existence of most private religious schools, and therefore the selection and supervision of the teachers upon whom the schools rely to do this work lie at the core of their mission," Alito wrote. "Judicial review of the way in which religious schools discharge those responsibilities would undermine the independence of religious institutions in a way that the First Amendment does not tolerate."

Alito was joined in the majority by Justices John Roberts, Clarence ThomasClarence ThomasCanceling the Constitution: Biden hailed for violating rule of law to extend eviction moratorium An obscure Supreme Court ruling is a cautionary tale of federal power Overnight Health Care: St. Louis reimposes mask mandate | Florida asks Supreme Court to block CDC's limits on cruise ship industry MORE, Brett KavanaughBrett Michael KavanaughCanceling the Constitution: Biden hailed for violating rule of law to extend eviction moratorium In praise of Susan Collins' persistent bipartisanship Sarah Palin says she's praying about running for Senate against Murkowski MORE, Neil GorsuchNeil GorsuchBiden speeds ahead on installing judges Canceling the Constitution: Biden hailed for violating rule of law to extend eviction moratorium No reason to pack the court MORE, Elena KaganElena KaganCongress should butt out of Supreme Court's business No reason to pack the court American freedom is on the line MORE and Stephen BreyerStephen BreyerBiden speeds ahead on installing judges Senate panel votes to make women register for draft Biden's belated filibuster decision: A pretense of principle at work MORE.

Justices Ruth Bader GinsburgRuth Bader GinsburgCongress must restore the full protections of the Voting Rights Act —voting discrimination is the real threat Bill would honor Ginsburg, O'Connor with statues at Capitol Supreme Court's approval rating dips to 49 percent  MORE and Sonia SotomayorSonia SotomayorSenate panel votes to make women register for draft No reason to pack the court Supreme Court ruling opens door to more campaign finance challenges MORE dissented, arguing that the decision will give religious institutions license to discriminate against their employees.

"This sweeping result is profoundly unfair," Sotomayor wrote in a dissenting opinion. "Recently, this Court has lamented a perceived 'discrimination against religion.' Yet here it swings the pendulum in the extreme opposite direction, permitting religious entities to discriminate widely and with impunity for reasons wholly divorced from religious beliefs."  

"The inherent injustice in the Court’s conclusion will be impossible to ignore for long, particularly in a pluralistic society like ours," Sotomayor added.

The decision comes on the same day that the court ruled in the same 7-2 fashion to uphold a Trump administration rule allowing companies to opt out of paying for their employees' birth control as part of their health coverage. 

The Supreme Court said in a 2012 ruling that the ministerial exception was essential for allowing religious institutions to practice and preach their faith without government interference. But the decision was vague about who qualified under the exception.

The latest decision overturns a pair of appellate court decisions that found the two teachers held secular positions within the schools, allowing them to sue for employment discrimination.

Alito said religious institutions are entitled to some deference by the courts in deciding who qualifies as a minister. 

"In a country with the religious diversity of the United States, judges cannot be expected to have a complete understanding and appreciation of the role played by every person who performs a particular role in every religious tradition," Alito wrote. "A religious institution’s explanation of the role of such employees in the life of the religion in question is important."

Sotomayor, in her dissent, countered Alito, saying that his "simplistic approach has no basis in law and strips thousands of schoolteachers of their legal protections" and noted that the two plaintiffs weren't even required to be Catholic to hold their teaching positions.

Updated at 11:26 a.m.