Supreme Court rulings reignite Trump oversight wars in Congress

Two Supreme Court decisions Thursday dealing with President TrumpDonald John TrumpDeWine tests negative for coronavirus a second time Several GOP lawmakers express concern over Trump executive orders Beirut aftermath poses test for US aid to frustrating ally MORE's financial records reignited a fight over congressional oversight, with both Democrats and Republicans arguing the rulings were favorable to their respective positions.

In one of the two cases, the court upheld a subpoena that the Manhattan district attorney's office issued to Trump's accounting firm for the president's tax returns and financial records. Justices also rejected Trump's argument that sitting presidents have sweeping immunity from the criminal process.

In the other ruling, the court did not give Congress access to Trump's financial records that Democratic-led House committees subpoenaed from the president's accounting firm and banks, sending the matter back to lower courts.

ADVERTISEMENT

Congressional Democrats cheered the ruling in the first case involving Manhattan prosecutors, arguing the Supreme Court found that Trump is not above the law.

“No matter how much he wishes it to be true, President Trump is not king," Senate Minority Leader Charles SchumerChuck SchumerPelosi, Schumer slam Trump executive orders, call for GOP to come back to negotiating table Sunday shows preview: White House, congressional Democrats unable to breach stalemate over coronavirus relief Postal Service says it lost .2 billion over three-month period MORE (D-N.Y.) said in a statement. "In a devastating blow to President Trump and his enablers in the Republican party, the Supreme Court today upheld a fundamental tenet of our democracy that no one is above the law."

Democrats also argued that the Supreme Court said in the second case that Congress's ability to conduct oversight is important.

“A careful reading of the Supreme Court rulings related to the President’s financial records is not good news for President Trump," Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiPelosi, Schumer slam Trump executive orders, call for GOP to come back to negotiating table Trump signs executive orders after coronavirus relief talks falter Sunday shows preview: White House, congressional Democrats unable to breach stalemate over coronavirus relief MORE (D-Calif.) said. “The Court has reaffirmed the Congress’s authority to conduct oversight on behalf of the American people, as it asks for further information from the Congress."

Democrats expressed disappointment that they were not granted access to Trump's financial records, but said they would pursue their subpoenas of his financial records in the lower courts.

ADVERTISEMENT

"While I had hoped the Court’s decision today would fully endorse the subpoenas our Committee issued and provide us with immediate access to the documents we requested, I remain committed to pursuing this case through the lower courts in accordance with the Court’s ruling," said House Financial Services Committee Chairwoman Maxine WatersMaxine Moore WatersMaxine Waters expresses confidence Biden will pick Black woman as VP Bill from Warren, Gillibrand and Waters would make Fed fight economic racial inequalities Waters rips Trump, GOP over mail-in ballots: 'They'll lie, cheat and steal to stay in power' MORE (D-Calif.), whose committee was one of two panels that issued the subpoenas to Trump's banks.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam SchiffAdam Bennett SchiffGOP chairmen hit back at accusation they are spreading disinformation with Biden probe Schiff, Khanna call for free masks for all Americans in coronavirus aid package House Intelligence panel opens probe into DHS's involvement in response to protests MORE (D-Calif.), whose committee also subpoenaed Deutsche Bank, said the Supreme Court's remand of the case to lower courts "will serve to delay the Committee’s investigation — and, given the risk of foreign influence over this President, such delay is dangerous — but we remain confident that we will ultimately prevail."

In a lawsuit that is separate from those at the center of the Supreme Court's rulings, the House Ways and Committee is seeking to get the courts to enforce the panel's requests and subpoenas to the Treasury Department and IRS for Trump's tax returns. That case is before a federal judge in Washington, D.C.

Committee Chairman Richard NealRichard Edmund NealBiden says Trump executive order is 'a reckless war on Social Security' Conservatives urge Trump to take unilateral action to suspend payroll tax collection Treasury to conduct policy review of tax-exempt status for universities after Trump tweets MORE (D-Mass.) said he thinks he will prevail in his case after reading the Supreme Court's opinions.

"The Committee’s case meets the considerations now articulated by the Court and is further bolstered by a clear statutory right in the tax code," he said. "The law is on our side and the Administration has no basis whatsoever to continue to refuse to comply with my request."

ADVERTISEMENT

Meanwhile, Republican lawmakers responded to the Supreme Court's rulings by characterizing Democrats' investigations as political.

"The Court recognized what Republicans have said all along: this was a partisan fishing expedition," said Rep. Patrick McHenryPatrick Timothy McHenryCheney battle raises questions about House GOP's future Hillicon Valley: Democrats request counterintelligence briefing | New pressure for election funding | Republicans urge retaliation against Chinese hackers House Republicans urge Trump to take action against Chinese hackers targeting coronavirus research MORE (N.C.), the top Republican on the Financial Services Committee.

McHenry added that he hopes "the Democrat leadership will be more mindful of those legitimate privacy interests and more protective of our institutional interests as this process plays out pursuant to the Court’s order."

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthyKevin Owen McCarthySunday shows preview: White House, congressional Democrats unable to breach stalemate over coronavirus relief A trillion stimulus, but Kevin McCarthy for renewable energy — leading businesses want to change that When will telling the truth in politics matter again? MORE (R-Calif.) did not comment on the Supreme Court's rulings but argued that the Manhattan district attorney's office's efforts to get Trump's financial documents were politically motivated. The DA's office is led by a Democrat, Cyrus Vance Jr.

“It seems to me the New York district attorney and others that have tried for it — it seems much more political than anything else," McCarthy told reporters.

The top Republican on the House Ways and Means Committee, Rep. Kevin BradyKevin Patrick BradyOn The Money: Five takeaways from the July jobs report Stimulus checks debate now focuses on size, eligibility Pelosi huddles with chairmen on surprise billing but deal elusive MORE (Texas), argued that the court's rulings will hurt Democrats' efforts to obtain Trump's tax returns.

“The Supreme Court dealt a blow to Congressional Democrats' unprecedented grab to seize the Presidents tax returns for purely political reasons," he said. "There is no valid legislative purpose for their so-called 'oversight' actions, whose result would be to weaponize the tax code and put every American’s tax return at risk of political targeting by future Congresses.”